GHSA-8FR7-79W9-7H79

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:45 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:35
VLAI?
Details

Multiple integer overflows in src/image.c in Ziproxy before 3.0.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a large JPG image, related to the jpg2bitmap function or (2) a large PNG image, related to the png2bitmap function, leading to heap-based buffer overflows.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2010-1513"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2010-05-26T19:30:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Multiple integer overflows in src/image.c in Ziproxy before 3.0.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a large JPG image, related to the jpg2bitmap function or (2) a large PNG image, related to the png2bitmap function, leading to heap-based buffer overflows.",
  "id": "GHSA-8fr7-79w9-7h79",
  "modified": "2025-04-11T03:35:33Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T02:45:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-1513"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/39941"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2010-75"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/511424/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://ziproxy.sourceforge.net/#news"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…