GHSA-8CMM-J6C4-RR8V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-25 21:17 – Updated: 2026-03-25 21:17
VLAI?
Summary
Vikunja has Cross-Project Information Disclosure via Task Relations — Missing Authorization Check on Related Task Read
Details

Summary

When the Vikunja API returns tasks, it populates the related_tasks field with full task objects for all related tasks without checking whether the requesting user has read permission on those tasks' projects. An authenticated user who can read a task that has cross-project relations will receive full details (title, description, due dates, priority, percent completion, project ID, etc.) of tasks in projects they have no access to.

Details

The vulnerability is in addRelatedTasksToTasks() at pkg/models/tasks.go:496-548. This function is called by addMoreInfoToTasks() (line 773) during every task read operation — both project task listings (GET /api/v1/projects/{id}/views/{id}/tasks) and single task reads (GET /api/v1/tasks/{id}).

The function fetches all related tasks directly from the database without any permission filtering:

// pkg/models/tasks.go:496-548
func addRelatedTasksToTasks(s *xorm.Session, taskIDs []int64, taskMap map[int64]*Task, a web.Auth) (err error) {
    relatedTasks := []*TaskRelation{}
    err = s.In("task_id", taskIDs).Find(&relatedTasks)
    // ...
    fullRelatedTasks := make(map[int64]*Task)
    err = s.In("id", relatedTaskIDs).Find(&fullRelatedTasks)  // Line 514: NO permission check
    // ...
    for _, rt := range relatedTasks {
        // Directly adds to response without checking if user can read the related task
        taskMap[rt.TaskID].RelatedTasks[rt.RelationKind] = append(
            taskMap[rt.TaskID].RelatedTasks[rt.RelationKind], otherTask)
    }
}

The a web.Auth parameter is received but only used for determining favorites (line 519), never for access control on the related tasks themselves.

In contrast, addBucketsToTasks() (line 550+) in the same file correctly filters enrichment data by calling getAllRawProjects(s, a, ...) to scope results to projects the requesting user can access.

While task relation creation properly enforces authorization (task_relation_permissions.go:32-52 checks write access on the base task and read access on the other task), the relation display path does not re-check permissions for the current reader. This means a privileged user can create a relation that then leaks data to all other users who can read the base task.

PoC

Setup: Two users (User A, User B), two projects (Project-Shared, Project-Private). - User A has access to both projects. - User B has access only to Project-Shared. - Task 1 exists in Project-Shared, Task 2 exists in Project-Private.

Step 1: User A creates a relation between the two tasks

# As User A (who has access to both projects)
curl -X PUT "http://localhost:3456/api/v1/tasks/TASK1_ID/relations" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer USER_A_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"other_task_id": TASK2_ID, "relation_kind": "related"}'

Expected: 201 Created (User A has write on Task 1, read on Task 2).

Step 2: User B reads tasks from the shared project

# As User B (who has NO access to Project-Private)
curl "http://localhost:3456/api/v1/projects/PROJECT_SHARED_ID/views/VIEW_ID/tasks" \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer USER_B_TOKEN"

Expected: Task 1 should be returned, but related_tasks should NOT include Task 2.

Actual result: The response includes Task 1 with the related_tasks field containing the full Task 2 object, including its title, description, due_date, priority, percent_done, project_id, and other metadata — despite User B having no access to Project-Private.

Impact

  • Information disclosure: Any authenticated user can read the full metadata of tasks in projects they do not have access to, as long as a relation exists from a task they can read.
  • Leaked fields include: title, description, due dates, start dates, priority, percent completion, project ID, hex color, task index, done status, repeat configuration, cover image attachment ID, and creation/update timestamps.
  • Project structure disclosure: The project_id field reveals the existence and IDs of private projects.
  • No user interaction required: Once a privileged user creates a cross-project relation (which is intentionally allowed), the data leak is automatic for all readers of the base task.
  • Blast radius: Affects all Vikunja instances with cross-project task relations. In multi-tenant or team environments where projects have different access scopes, this undermines project-level access control.

Recommended Fix

Filter related tasks by the requesting user's read permissions before adding them to the response. In addRelatedTasksToTasks(), after fetching full task objects, check that the user can read each related task's project:

func addRelatedTasksToTasks(s *xorm.Session, taskIDs []int64, taskMap map[int64]*Task, a web.Auth) (err error) {
    relatedTasks := []*TaskRelation{}
    err = s.In("task_id", taskIDs).Find(&relatedTasks)
    if err != nil {
        return
    }

    var relatedTaskIDs []int64
    for _, rt := range relatedTasks {
        relatedTaskIDs = append(relatedTaskIDs, rt.OtherTaskID)
    }

    if len(relatedTaskIDs) == 0 {
        return
    }

    fullRelatedTasks := make(map[int64]*Task)
    err = s.In("id", relatedTaskIDs).Find(&fullRelatedTasks)
    if err != nil {
        return
    }

    // Filter related tasks by user's read permission
    allowedProjectIDs := make(map[int64]bool)
    checkedProjectIDs := make(map[int64]bool)
    for _, t := range fullRelatedTasks {
        if checkedProjectIDs[t.ProjectID] {
            continue
        }
        checkedProjectIDs[t.ProjectID] = true
        p := &Project{ID: t.ProjectID}
        canRead, _, err := p.CanRead(s, a)
        if err != nil {
            log.Errorf("Could not check project read permission: %v", err)
            continue
        }
        if canRead {
            allowedProjectIDs[t.ProjectID] = true
        }
    }

    taskFavorites, err := getFavorites(s, relatedTaskIDs, a, FavoriteKindTask)
    if err != nil {
        return err
    }

    for _, rt := range relatedTasks {
        task, has := fullRelatedTasks[rt.OtherTaskID]
        if !has {
            continue
        }
        // Skip related tasks the user cannot access
        if !allowedProjectIDs[task.ProjectID] {
            continue
        }
        fullRelatedTasks[rt.OtherTaskID].IsFavorite = taskFavorites[rt.OtherTaskID]
        otherTask := &Task{}
        err = copier.Copy(otherTask, fullRelatedTasks[rt.OtherTaskID])
        if err != nil {
            log.Errorf("Could not duplicate task object: %v", err)
            continue
        }
        otherTask.RelatedTasks = nil
        taskMap[rt.TaskID].RelatedTasks[rt.RelationKind] = append(
            taskMap[rt.TaskID].RelatedTasks[rt.RelationKind], otherTask)
    }

    return
}

This checks project-level read permission once per unique project ID (cached in allowedProjectIDs) and skips related tasks from projects the user cannot access.

Severity ?
6.5 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.2.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "code.vikunja.io/api"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.2.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-33676"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-25T21:17:12Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-24T16:16:34Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nWhen the Vikunja API returns tasks, it populates the `related_tasks` field with full task objects for all related tasks without checking whether the requesting user has read permission on those tasks\u0027 projects. An authenticated user who can read a task that has cross-project relations will receive full details (title, description, due dates, priority, percent completion, project ID, etc.) of tasks in projects they have no access to.\n\n## Details\n\nThe vulnerability is in `addRelatedTasksToTasks()` at `pkg/models/tasks.go:496-548`. This function is called by `addMoreInfoToTasks()` (line 773) during every task read operation \u2014 both project task listings (`GET /api/v1/projects/{id}/views/{id}/tasks`) and single task reads (`GET /api/v1/tasks/{id}`).\n\nThe function fetches all related tasks directly from the database without any permission filtering:\n\n```go\n// pkg/models/tasks.go:496-548\nfunc addRelatedTasksToTasks(s *xorm.Session, taskIDs []int64, taskMap map[int64]*Task, a web.Auth) (err error) {\n    relatedTasks := []*TaskRelation{}\n    err = s.In(\"task_id\", taskIDs).Find(\u0026relatedTasks)\n    // ...\n    fullRelatedTasks := make(map[int64]*Task)\n    err = s.In(\"id\", relatedTaskIDs).Find(\u0026fullRelatedTasks)  // Line 514: NO permission check\n    // ...\n    for _, rt := range relatedTasks {\n        // Directly adds to response without checking if user can read the related task\n        taskMap[rt.TaskID].RelatedTasks[rt.RelationKind] = append(\n            taskMap[rt.TaskID].RelatedTasks[rt.RelationKind], otherTask)\n    }\n}\n```\n\nThe `a web.Auth` parameter is received but only used for determining favorites (line 519), never for access control on the related tasks themselves.\n\nIn contrast, `addBucketsToTasks()` (line 550+) in the same file correctly filters enrichment data by calling `getAllRawProjects(s, a, ...)` to scope results to projects the requesting user can access.\n\nWhile task relation **creation** properly enforces authorization (`task_relation_permissions.go:32-52` checks write access on the base task and read access on the other task), the relation **display** path does not re-check permissions for the current reader. This means a privileged user can create a relation that then leaks data to all other users who can read the base task.\n\n## PoC\n\n**Setup:** Two users (User A, User B), two projects (Project-Shared, Project-Private).\n- User A has access to both projects.\n- User B has access only to Project-Shared.\n- Task 1 exists in Project-Shared, Task 2 exists in Project-Private.\n\n**Step 1: User A creates a relation between the two tasks**\n\n```bash\n# As User A (who has access to both projects)\ncurl -X PUT \"http://localhost:3456/api/v1/tasks/TASK1_ID/relations\" \\\n  -H \"Authorization: Bearer USER_A_TOKEN\" \\\n  -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n  -d \u0027{\"other_task_id\": TASK2_ID, \"relation_kind\": \"related\"}\u0027\n```\n\nExpected: 201 Created (User A has write on Task 1, read on Task 2).\n\n**Step 2: User B reads tasks from the shared project**\n\n```bash\n# As User B (who has NO access to Project-Private)\ncurl \"http://localhost:3456/api/v1/projects/PROJECT_SHARED_ID/views/VIEW_ID/tasks\" \\\n  -H \"Authorization: Bearer USER_B_TOKEN\"\n```\n\nExpected: Task 1 should be returned, but related_tasks should NOT include Task 2.\n\n**Actual result:** The response includes Task 1 with the `related_tasks` field containing the full Task 2 object, including its `title`, `description`, `due_date`, `priority`, `percent_done`, `project_id`, and other metadata \u2014 despite User B having no access to Project-Private.\n\n## Impact\n\n- **Information disclosure**: Any authenticated user can read the full metadata of tasks in projects they do not have access to, as long as a relation exists from a task they can read.\n- **Leaked fields include**: title, description, due dates, start dates, priority, percent completion, project ID, hex color, task index, done status, repeat configuration, cover image attachment ID, and creation/update timestamps.\n- **Project structure disclosure**: The `project_id` field reveals the existence and IDs of private projects.\n- **No user interaction required**: Once a privileged user creates a cross-project relation (which is intentionally allowed), the data leak is automatic for all readers of the base task.\n- **Blast radius**: Affects all Vikunja instances with cross-project task relations. In multi-tenant or team environments where projects have different access scopes, this undermines project-level access control.\n\n## Recommended Fix\n\nFilter related tasks by the requesting user\u0027s read permissions before adding them to the response. In `addRelatedTasksToTasks()`, after fetching full task objects, check that the user can read each related task\u0027s project:\n\n```go\nfunc addRelatedTasksToTasks(s *xorm.Session, taskIDs []int64, taskMap map[int64]*Task, a web.Auth) (err error) {\n    relatedTasks := []*TaskRelation{}\n    err = s.In(\"task_id\", taskIDs).Find(\u0026relatedTasks)\n    if err != nil {\n        return\n    }\n\n    var relatedTaskIDs []int64\n    for _, rt := range relatedTasks {\n        relatedTaskIDs = append(relatedTaskIDs, rt.OtherTaskID)\n    }\n\n    if len(relatedTaskIDs) == 0 {\n        return\n    }\n\n    fullRelatedTasks := make(map[int64]*Task)\n    err = s.In(\"id\", relatedTaskIDs).Find(\u0026fullRelatedTasks)\n    if err != nil {\n        return\n    }\n\n    // Filter related tasks by user\u0027s read permission\n    allowedProjectIDs := make(map[int64]bool)\n    checkedProjectIDs := make(map[int64]bool)\n    for _, t := range fullRelatedTasks {\n        if checkedProjectIDs[t.ProjectID] {\n            continue\n        }\n        checkedProjectIDs[t.ProjectID] = true\n        p := \u0026Project{ID: t.ProjectID}\n        canRead, _, err := p.CanRead(s, a)\n        if err != nil {\n            log.Errorf(\"Could not check project read permission: %v\", err)\n            continue\n        }\n        if canRead {\n            allowedProjectIDs[t.ProjectID] = true\n        }\n    }\n\n    taskFavorites, err := getFavorites(s, relatedTaskIDs, a, FavoriteKindTask)\n    if err != nil {\n        return err\n    }\n\n    for _, rt := range relatedTasks {\n        task, has := fullRelatedTasks[rt.OtherTaskID]\n        if !has {\n            continue\n        }\n        // Skip related tasks the user cannot access\n        if !allowedProjectIDs[task.ProjectID] {\n            continue\n        }\n        fullRelatedTasks[rt.OtherTaskID].IsFavorite = taskFavorites[rt.OtherTaskID]\n        otherTask := \u0026Task{}\n        err = copier.Copy(otherTask, fullRelatedTasks[rt.OtherTaskID])\n        if err != nil {\n            log.Errorf(\"Could not duplicate task object: %v\", err)\n            continue\n        }\n        otherTask.RelatedTasks = nil\n        taskMap[rt.TaskID].RelatedTasks[rt.RelationKind] = append(\n            taskMap[rt.TaskID].RelatedTasks[rt.RelationKind], otherTask)\n    }\n\n    return\n}\n```\n\nThis checks project-level read permission once per unique project ID (cached in `allowedProjectIDs`) and skips related tasks from projects the user cannot access.",
  "id": "GHSA-8cmm-j6c4-rr8v",
  "modified": "2026-03-25T21:17:12Z",
  "published": "2026-03-25T21:17:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/security/advisories/GHSA-8cmm-j6c4-rr8v"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33676"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/pull/2449"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/commit/833f2aec006ac0f6643c41872e45dd79220b9174"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vikunja.io/changelog/vikunja-v2.2.2-was-released"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Vikunja has Cross-Project Information Disclosure via Task Relations \u2014 Missing Authorization Check on Related Task Read"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.