GHSA-88CF-9F4G-48WR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-02-17 06:30 – Updated: 2024-11-01 21:31
VLAI?
Details

Teltonika RUT240 devices with firmware before 07.04.2, when bridge mode is used, sometimes make SSH and HTTP services available on the IPv6 WAN interface even though the UI shows that they are only available on the LAN interface.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-31728"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-02-17T04:15:07Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Teltonika RUT240 devices with firmware before 07.04.2, when bridge mode is used, sometimes make SSH and HTTP services available on the IPv6 WAN interface even though the UI shows that they are only available on the LAN interface.",
  "id": "GHSA-88cf-9f4g-48wr",
  "modified": "2024-11-01T21:31:45Z",
  "published": "2024-02-17T06:30:34Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-31728"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://research.exoticsilicon.com/articles/lte_ethernet_bridge_bug_followup"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://research.exoticsilicon.com/news"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…