GHSA-83M2-9G78-RRJ4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:57 – Updated: 2025-04-14 20:46
VLAI?
Summary
Apache Ranger Cross-site Scripting vulnerability
Details
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Policy Admin Tool in Apache Ranger before 0.5.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the HTTP User-Agent header.
Severity ?
6.1 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.ranger:ranger"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.5.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-0265"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-04-14T20:46:58Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2016-04-11T19:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Policy Admin Tool in Apache Ranger before 0.5.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the HTTP User-Agent header.",
"id": "GHSA-83m2-9g78-rrj4",
"modified": "2025-04-14T20:46:58Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:57:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0265"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/RANGER/Vulnerabilities+found+in+Ranger"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/ranger"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ranger-dev/201508.mbox/%3CD1E7EC30.9D53F%25vel@apache.org%3E"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20200228073946/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/76208"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.slideshare.net/wojdwo/big-problems-with-big-data-hadoop-interfaces-security"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Apache Ranger Cross-site Scripting vulnerability"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…