GHSA-79JF-89PH-WP26
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-04 18:30 – Updated: 2026-02-04 18:30
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: fix NULL pointer dereference in do_abort_log_replay()
Coverity reported a NULL pointer dereference issue (CID 1666756) in do_abort_log_replay(). When btrfs_alloc_path() fails in replay_one_buffer(), wc->subvol_path is NULL, but btrfs_abort_log_replay() calls do_abort_log_replay() which unconditionally dereferences wc->subvol_path when attempting to print debug information. Fix this by adding a NULL check before dereferencing wc->subvol_path in do_abort_log_replay().
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-23043"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-02-04T16:16:19Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbtrfs: fix NULL pointer dereference in do_abort_log_replay()\n\nCoverity reported a NULL pointer dereference issue (CID 1666756) in\ndo_abort_log_replay(). When btrfs_alloc_path() fails in\nreplay_one_buffer(), wc-\u003esubvol_path is NULL, but btrfs_abort_log_replay()\ncalls do_abort_log_replay() which unconditionally dereferences\nwc-\u003esubvol_path when attempting to print debug information. Fix this by\nadding a NULL check before dereferencing wc-\u003esubvol_path in\ndo_abort_log_replay().",
"id": "GHSA-79jf-89ph-wp26",
"modified": "2026-02-04T18:30:41Z",
"published": "2026-02-04T18:30:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23043"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/530e3d4af566ca44807d79359b90794dea24c4f3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d1b61b8e1e44888c643d89225ab819b10649b2e"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…