GHSA-792Q-QW95-F446

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-03 23:11 – Updated: 2026-03-30 13:36
VLAI?
Summary
OpenClaw's Signal reaction-only status events could, in limited cases, be enqueued before access checks
Details

Summary

In a narrow Signal reaction-notification path, reaction-only inbound events could enqueue a status event before sender access checks were applied.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • Package: openclaw (npm)
  • Affected: <= 2026.2.24 (latest published at patch time)
  • Fixed: 2026.2.25

Details

In the affected flow (src/signal/monitor/event-handler.ts), reaction-only handling could return after enqueueSystemEvent(...) before DM/group authorization checks were evaluated for that sender.

This behavior was limited to reaction-only inbound events with reaction notifications enabled. In that case, a sender not authorized for normal DM flow could still queue a Signal reaction status line for that session.

The fix applies shared DM/group access checks before reaction notification enqueue. Pairing behavior for normal DM messages is unchanged.

Impact

  • Limited to Signal reaction-only inbound events.
  • Could add an unauthorized reaction status line to agent context for affected sessions.
  • Did not directly enable normal DM delivery or direct host command execution.

Fix Commit(s)

  • 2aa7842adeedef423be7ce283a9144b9f1a0a669

Release Process Note

patched_versions is pre-set to 2026.2.25 so once npm release is out, advisory publish can proceed directly.

OpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.2.24"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "openclaw"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2026.2.25"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-32050"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-03T23:11:47Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nIn a narrow Signal reaction-notification path, reaction-only inbound events could enqueue a status event before sender access checks were applied.\n\n### Affected Packages / Versions\n- Package: `openclaw` (npm)\n- Affected: `\u003c= 2026.2.24` (latest published at patch time)\n- Fixed: `2026.2.25` \n\n### Details\nIn the affected flow (`src/signal/monitor/event-handler.ts`), reaction-only handling could return after `enqueueSystemEvent(...)` before DM/group authorization checks were evaluated for that sender.\n\nThis behavior was limited to reaction-only inbound events with reaction notifications enabled. In that case, a sender not authorized for normal DM flow could still queue a Signal reaction status line for that session.\n\nThe fix applies shared DM/group access checks before reaction notification enqueue. Pairing behavior for normal DM messages is unchanged.\n\n### Impact\n- Limited to Signal reaction-only inbound events.\n- Could add an unauthorized reaction status line to agent context for affected sessions.\n- Did not directly enable normal DM delivery or direct host command execution.\n\n### Fix Commit(s)\n- `2aa7842adeedef423be7ce283a9144b9f1a0a669`\n\n### Release Process Note\n`patched_versions` is pre-set to `2026.2.25` so once npm release is out, advisory publish can proceed directly.\n\nOpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.",
  "id": "GHSA-792q-qw95-f446",
  "modified": "2026-03-30T13:36:18Z",
  "published": "2026-03-03T23:11:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-792q-qw95-f446"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32050"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/2aa7842adeedef423be7ce283a9144b9f1a0a669"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-unauthorized-reaction-status-event-enqueue-via-access-check-bypass"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "OpenClaw\u0027s Signal reaction-only status events could, in limited cases, be enqueued before access checks"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…