GHSA-7459-9RCQ-G3XJ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 02:56 – Updated: 2022-04-29 02:56
VLAI?
Details

The libCheckSignature function in crypto-utils.lib for OpenCA 0.9.1.6 and earlier only compares the serial of the signer's certificate and the one in the database, which can cause OpenCA to incorrectly accept a signature if the certificate's chain is trusted by OpenCA's chain directory, allowing remote attackers to spoof requests from other users.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-0004"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-02-17T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The libCheckSignature function in crypto-utils.lib for OpenCA 0.9.1.6 and earlier only compares the serial of the signer\u0027s certificate and the one in the database, which can cause OpenCA to incorrectly accept a signature if the certificate\u0027s chain is trusted by OpenCA\u0027s chain directory, allowing remote attackers to spoof requests from other users.",
  "id": "GHSA-7459-9rcq-g3xj",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T02:56:59Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:56:59Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0004"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/14847"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=107427313700554\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/336446"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openca.org/news/CAN-2004-0004.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/3615"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/9435"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…