GHSA-6R5Q-PFQQ-GH34
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:27 – Updated: 2024-02-14 18:30
VLAI?
Details
The DNS client in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, and Vista uses predictable DNS transaction IDs, which allows remote attackers to spoof DNS responses.
Severity ?
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-0087"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-287",
"CWE-330"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-04-08T23:05:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The DNS client in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP2, Server 2003 SP1 and SP2, and Vista uses predictable DNS transaction IDs, which allows remote attackers to spoof DNS responses.",
"id": "GHSA-6r5q-pfqq-gh34",
"modified": "2024-02-14T18:30:23Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T23:27:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-0087"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2008/ms08-020"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A5314"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=120845064910729\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/29696"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/490575/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28553"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019802"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.trusteer.com/docs/windowsresolver.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA08-099A.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/1144/references"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…