GHSA-69GH-7RJ2-J87C
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:26 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:26
VLAI?
Details
Armorlogic Profense Web Application Firewall before 2.2.22, and 2.4.x before 2.4.4, does not properly implement the "negative model," which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a modified end tag of a SCRIPT element.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-1593"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-05-21T14:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Armorlogic Profense Web Application Firewall before 2.2.22, and 2.4.x before 2.4.4, does not properly implement the \"negative model,\" which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a modified end tag of a SCRIPT element.",
"id": "GHSA-69gh-7rj2-j87c",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:26:40Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:26:40Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-1593"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50663"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://resources.enablesecurity.com/advisories/ES-20090500-profense.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/503649/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/35053"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.webappsec.org/lists/websecurity/archive/2009-05/msg00040.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…