GHSA-68QM-WH67-JRC3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:49 – Updated: 2024-04-04 01:12
VLAI?
Details
WolfVision Cynap before 1.30j uses a static, hard-coded cryptographic secret for generating support PINs for the 'forgot password' feature. By knowing this static secret and the corresponding algorithm for calculating support PINs, an attacker can reset the ADMIN password and thus gain remote access.
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-13352"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-798"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-07-05T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "WolfVision Cynap before 1.30j uses a static, hard-coded cryptographic secret for generating support PINs for the \u0027forgot password\u0027 feature. By knowing this static secret and the corresponding algorithm for calculating support PINs, an attacker can reset the ADMIN password and thus gain remote access.",
"id": "GHSA-68qm-wh67-jrc3",
"modified": "2024-04-04T01:12:22Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:49:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-13352"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.syss.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Publikationen/Advisories/SYSS-2019-021.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153530/WolfVision-Cynap-1.18g-1.28j-Hardcoded-Credential.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Jul/9"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…