GHSA-669F-5H8C-H58M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:39 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:39
VLAI?
Details

The cgre_receive_netlink_msg function in daemon/cgrulesengd.c in cgrulesengd in the Control Group Configuration Library (aka libcgroup or libcg) before 0.37.1 does not verify that netlink messages originated in the kernel, which allows local users to bypass intended resource restrictions via a crafted message.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-1022"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-03-22T17:55:00Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "The cgre_receive_netlink_msg function in daemon/cgrulesengd.c in cgrulesengd in the Control Group Configuration Library (aka libcgroup or libcg) before 0.37.1 does not verify that netlink messages originated in the kernel, which allows local users to bypass intended resource restrictions via a crafted message.",
  "id": "GHSA-669f-5h8c-h58m",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:39:46Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:39:46Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1022"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680409"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615987"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/056683.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/056734.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2011-04/msg00027.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/25/11"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/25/12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/25/14"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/25/6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/25/9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/43611"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/43758"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/43891"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/44093"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=26598749"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=27102603"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://sourceforge.net/projects/libcg/files/libcgroup/v0.37.1/libcgroup-0.37.1.tar.bz2/download"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2193"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0320.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46578"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025157"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0679"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0774"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.