GHSA-6399-J99H-665C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-03-27 00:30 – Updated: 2024-03-27 00:30
VLAI?
Details

Some Microsoft technologies as used in Windows 8 through 11 allow a temporary client-side performance degradation during processing of multiple Unicode combining characters, aka a "Zalgo text" attack. NOTE: third parties dispute whether the computational cost of interpreting Unicode data should be considered a vulnerability.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2017-20190"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-176"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-03-27T00:15:07Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "Some Microsoft technologies as used in Windows 8 through 11 allow a temporary client-side performance degradation during processing of multiple Unicode combining characters, aka a \"Zalgo text\" attack. NOTE: third parties dispute whether the computational cost of interpreting Unicode data should be considered a vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-6399-j99h-665c",
  "modified": "2024-03-27T00:30:57Z",
  "published": "2024-03-27T00:30:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-20190"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://aka.ms/windowsbugbar"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zalgo_text"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://talk.dynalist.io/t/dynalist-is-vulnerable-to-zalgo/1234"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…