GHSA-5WW2-XM4X-3HM3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-01 15:30 – Updated: 2026-05-03 09:33
VLAI?
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ksmbd: validate response sizes in ipc_validate_msg()

ipc_validate_msg() computes the expected message size for each response type by adding (or multiplying) attacker-controlled fields from the daemon response to a fixed struct size in unsigned int arithmetic. Three cases can overflow:

KSMBD_EVENT_RPC_REQUEST: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_rpc_command) + resp->payload_sz; KSMBD_EVENT_SHARE_CONFIG_REQUEST: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_share_config_response) + resp->payload_sz; KSMBD_EVENT_LOGIN_REQUEST_EXT: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_login_response_ext) + resp->ngroups * sizeof(gid_t);

resp->payload_sz is __u32 and resp->ngroups is __s32. Each addition can wrap in unsigned int; the multiplication by sizeof(gid_t) mixes signed and size_t, so a negative ngroups is converted to SIZE_MAX before the multiply. A wrapped value of msg_sz that happens to equal entry->msg_sz bypasses the size check on the next line, and downstream consumers (smb2pdu.c:6742 memcpy using rpc_resp->payload_sz, kmemdup in ksmbd_alloc_user using resp_ext->ngroups) then trust the unverified length.

Use check_add_overflow() on the RPC_REQUEST and SHARE_CONFIG_REQUEST paths to detect integer overflow without constraining functional payload size; userspace ksmbd-tools grows NDR responses in 4096-byte chunks for calls like NetShareEnumAll, so a hard transport cap is unworkable on the response side. For LOGIN_REQUEST_EXT, reject resp->ngroups outside the signed [0, NGROUPS_MAX] range up front and report the error from ipc_validate_msg() so it fires at the IPC boundary; with that bound the subsequent multiplication and addition stay well below UINT_MAX. The now-redundant ngroups check and pr_err in ksmbd_alloc_user() are removed.

This is the response-side analogue of aab98e2dbd64 ("ksmbd: fix integer overflows on 32 bit systems"), which hardened the request side.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-31707"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-787"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-01T14:16:20Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nksmbd: validate response sizes in ipc_validate_msg()\n\nipc_validate_msg() computes the expected message size for each\nresponse type by adding (or multiplying) attacker-controlled fields\nfrom the daemon response to a fixed struct size in unsigned int\narithmetic.  Three cases can overflow:\n\n  KSMBD_EVENT_RPC_REQUEST:\n      msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_rpc_command) + resp-\u003epayload_sz;\n  KSMBD_EVENT_SHARE_CONFIG_REQUEST:\n      msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_share_config_response) +\n               resp-\u003epayload_sz;\n  KSMBD_EVENT_LOGIN_REQUEST_EXT:\n      msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_login_response_ext) +\n               resp-\u003engroups * sizeof(gid_t);\n\nresp-\u003epayload_sz is __u32 and resp-\u003engroups is __s32.  Each addition\ncan wrap in unsigned int; the multiplication by sizeof(gid_t) mixes\nsigned and size_t, so a negative ngroups is converted to SIZE_MAX\nbefore the multiply.  A wrapped value of msg_sz that happens to\nequal entry-\u003emsg_sz bypasses the size check on the next line, and\ndownstream consumers (smb2pdu.c:6742 memcpy using rpc_resp-\u003epayload_sz,\nkmemdup in ksmbd_alloc_user using resp_ext-\u003engroups) then trust the\nunverified length.\n\nUse check_add_overflow() on the RPC_REQUEST and SHARE_CONFIG_REQUEST\npaths to detect integer overflow without constraining functional\npayload size; userspace ksmbd-tools grows NDR responses in 4096-byte\nchunks for calls like NetShareEnumAll, so a hard transport cap is\nunworkable on the response side.  For LOGIN_REQUEST_EXT, reject\nresp-\u003engroups outside the signed [0, NGROUPS_MAX] range up front and\nreport the error from ipc_validate_msg() so it fires at the IPC\nboundary; with that bound the subsequent multiplication and addition\nstay well below UINT_MAX.  The now-redundant ngroups check and\npr_err in ksmbd_alloc_user() are removed.\n\nThis is the response-side analogue of aab98e2dbd64 (\"ksmbd: fix\ninteger overflows on 32 bit systems\"), which hardened the request\nside.",
  "id": "GHSA-5ww2-xm4x-3hm3",
  "modified": "2026-05-03T09:33:09Z",
  "published": "2026-05-01T15:30:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31707"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/299db777ea0cfa5c407e41b045c24a14c034c27b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7dd0c858e1909769a4c91842724315ee74f1a5f1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/99c631d0366c1eab8fb188fe66425f4581ebdde4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d6a6aa81eac2c9bff66dc6e191179cb69a14426b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…