GHSA-5GQC-QHRJ-9XW8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-14 23:15 – Updated: 2026-04-24 20:39
VLAI
Summary
Oxia affected by server crash via race condition in session heartbeat handling
Details

Summary

A race condition between session heartbeat processing and session closure can cause the server to panic with send on closed channel. The heartbeat() method uses a blocking channel send while holding a mutex, and under specific timing with concurrent close() calls, this can lead to either a deadlock (channel buffer full) or a panic (send on closed channel after TOCTOU gap in KeepAlive).

Impact

A remote client can trigger a server crash by sending rapid KeepAlive requests while a session is expiring or being closed. This is a denial-of-service vulnerability that crashes the entire data server process.

All versions are affected.

Details

In oxiad/dataserver/controller/lead/session.go, the heartbeat() method performs a blocking s.heartbeatCh <- true send. If the channel buffer is full (size 1), this blocks while holding the session mutex, preventing close() from acquiring the lock to close the channel — a deadlock.

Additionally, in session_manager.go, KeepAlive() releases the session manager's read lock before calling heartbeat(), creating a TOCTOU window where the session can be removed and closed between the lookup and the heartbeat call.

Patches

Fixed by changing heartbeat() to use a non-blocking select with a default case, and by holding the session manager read lock through the entire KeepAlive() operation.

Workarounds

No workaround available.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.16.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/oxia-db/oxia"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.16.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-40943"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-362"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-04-14T23:15:00Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-21T22:16:19Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nA race condition between session heartbeat processing and session closure can cause the server to panic with `send on closed channel`. The `heartbeat()` method uses a blocking channel send while holding a mutex, and under specific timing with concurrent `close()` calls, this can lead to either a deadlock (channel buffer full) or a panic (send on closed channel after TOCTOU gap in `KeepAlive`).\n\n### Impact\nA remote client can trigger a server crash by sending rapid `KeepAlive` requests while a session is expiring or being closed. This is a denial-of-service vulnerability that crashes the entire data server process.\n\nAll versions are affected.\n\n### Details\nIn `oxiad/dataserver/controller/lead/session.go`, the `heartbeat()` method performs a blocking `s.heartbeatCh \u003c- true` send. If the channel buffer is full (size 1), this blocks while holding the session mutex, preventing `close()` from acquiring the lock to close the channel \u2014 a deadlock.\n\nAdditionally, in `session_manager.go`, `KeepAlive()` releases the session manager\u0027s read lock before calling `heartbeat()`, creating a TOCTOU window where the session can be removed and closed between the lookup and the heartbeat call.\n\n### Patches\nFixed by changing `heartbeat()` to use a non-blocking `select` with a `default` case, and by holding the session manager read lock through the entire `KeepAlive()` operation.\n\n### Workarounds\nNo workaround available.",
  "id": "GHSA-5gqc-qhrj-9xw8",
  "modified": "2026-04-24T20:39:44Z",
  "published": "2026-04-14T23:15:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/oxia-db/oxia/security/advisories/GHSA-5gqc-qhrj-9xw8"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-40943"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/oxia-db/oxia"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Oxia affected by server crash via race condition in session heartbeat handling"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.