GHSA-5F38-9JW2-6R6H
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-10-12 16:22 – Updated: 2022-05-04 03:42
VLAI?
Summary
Cross-site Scripting in teddy
Details
Teddy is a readable and easy to learn templating language. This affects the package teddy before 0.5.9. A type confusion vulnerability can be used to bypass input sanitization when the model content is an array (instead of a string).
Severity ?
5.4 (Medium)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "teddy"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.5.9"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-23447"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79",
"CWE-843"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-10-08T21:52:26Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2021-10-07T17:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Teddy is a readable and easy to learn templating language. This affects the package teddy before 0.5.9. A type confusion vulnerability can be used to bypass input sanitization when the model content is an array (instead of a string).",
"id": "GHSA-5f38-9jw2-6r6h",
"modified": "2022-05-04T03:42:48Z",
"published": "2021-10-12T16:22:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-23447"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rooseveltframework/teddy/pull/518"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rooseveltframework/teddy/commit/64c556717b4879bf8d4c30067cf6e70d899a3dc0"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/rooseveltframework/teddy"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rooseveltframework/teddy/releases/tag/0.5.9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-TEDDY-1579557"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Cross-site Scripting in teddy"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…