GHSA-56HV-7V48-W28M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 03:59 – Updated: 2022-05-17 03:59
VLAI?
Details
The HTTPS fallback implementation in Shell In A Box (aka shellinabox) before 2.19 makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct DNS rebinding attacks via the "/plain" URL.
Severity ?
7.4 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2015-8400"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2016-01-12T19:59:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The HTTPS fallback implementation in Shell In A Box (aka shellinabox) before 2.19 makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct DNS rebinding attacks via the \"/plain\" URL.",
"id": "GHSA-56hv-7v48-w28m",
"modified": "2022-05-17T03:59:31Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T03:59:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-8400"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/shellinabox/shellinabox/issues/355"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/shellinabox/shellinabox/releases/tag/v2.19"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-January/175117.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-January/175224.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/12/02/6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/12/02/7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…