GHSA-542F-CG4P-XCHV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:37 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:37
VLAI?
Details
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in mod.php in DiY-CMS 1.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create a poll via an add action to the poll module.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-6518"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2013-01-24T01:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in mod.php in DiY-CMS 1.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create a poll via an add action to the poll module.",
"id": "GHSA-542f-cg4p-xchv",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:37:28Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:37:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-6518"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/75230"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-04/0213.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/files/112224/DIY-CMS-1.0-Poll-XSS-CSRF-SQL-Injection.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/49011"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/18804"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/81562"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/53266"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vulnerability-lab.com/get_content.php?id=518"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…