GHSA-4RQQ-W8V4-7P47
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-04 19:03 – Updated: 2026-03-19 22:22
VLAI?
Summary
OpenClaw has incomplete IPv4 special-use SSRF blocking in web fetch guard
Details
Summary
isPrivateIpv4() in bundled SSRF guard code missed several IPv4 special-use/non-global ranges, so web_fetch could allow targets that should be blocked by SSRF policy.
Affected Packages / Versions
- Package:
openclaw(npm) - Latest published affected version:
2026.2.21-2(published 2026-02-21) - Structured vulnerable range:
<= 2026.2.21-2 - Planned patched version (pre-set):
>= 2026.2.22
Impact
Low severity. Exploitation requires network reachability to the relevant special-use ranges and a request path that reaches web_fetch URL fetching.
Technical Details
Affected releases used narrow IPv4 private-range checks that omitted multiple RFC special-use/non-global ranges. This allowed requests such as http://198.18.0.1/... through SSRF validation in affected releases. Follow-up hardening consolidates local-host/tailnet range checks so gateway/browser/tailnet paths share one canonical IP classification flow.
Fix Commit(s)
71bd15bb4294d3d1b54386064d69cd0f5f731bd844dfbd23df453e51b71ef79a148c28c53e89168c333fbb86347998526dd514290adfd5f727caa6d9f14ebd743cfc73f667fae80af70043d0ab1f88bd
OpenClaw thanks @princeeismond-dot for reporting.
Severity ?
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "openclaw"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2026.2.22"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-32019"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-04T19:03:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n`isPrivateIpv4()` in bundled SSRF guard code missed several IPv4 special-use/non-global ranges, so `web_fetch` could allow targets that should be blocked by SSRF policy.\n\n### Affected Packages / Versions\n- Package: `openclaw` (npm)\n- Latest published affected version: `2026.2.21-2` (published 2026-02-21)\n- Structured vulnerable range: `\u003c= 2026.2.21-2`\n- Planned patched version (pre-set): `\u003e= 2026.2.22`\n\n### Impact\nLow severity. Exploitation requires network reachability to the relevant special-use ranges and a request path that reaches `web_fetch` URL fetching.\n\n### Technical Details\nAffected releases used narrow IPv4 private-range checks that omitted multiple RFC special-use/non-global ranges. This allowed requests such as `http://198.18.0.1/...` through SSRF validation in affected releases. Follow-up hardening consolidates local-host/tailnet range checks so gateway/browser/tailnet paths share one canonical IP classification flow.\n\n### Fix Commit(s)\n- `71bd15bb4294d3d1b54386064d69cd0f5f731bd8`\n- `44dfbd23df453e51b71ef79a148c28c53e89168c`\n- `333fbb86347998526dd514290adfd5f727caa6d9`\n- `f14ebd743cfc73f667fae80af70043d0ab1f88bd`\n\nOpenClaw thanks @princeeismond-dot for reporting.",
"id": "GHSA-4rqq-w8v4-7p47",
"modified": "2026-03-19T22:22:49Z",
"published": "2026-03-04T19:03:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-4rqq-w8v4-7p47"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/333fbb86347998526dd514290adfd5f727caa6d9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/44dfbd23df453e51b71ef79a148c28c53e89168c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/71bd15bb4294d3d1b54386064d69cd0f5f731bd8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/f14ebd743cfc73f667fae80af70043d0ab1f88bd"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "OpenClaw has incomplete IPv4 special-use SSRF blocking in web fetch guard"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…