GHSA-4JW9-FVM9-J437

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:57 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:57
VLAI?
Details

TUKEVA Password Reminder before 1.0.0.4 uses a hard-coded password for rem.accdb, which allows local users to discover credentials via a DBI connection.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-4781"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2010-04-21T14:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "TUKEVA Password Reminder before 1.0.0.4 uses a hard-coded password for rem.accdb, which allows local users to discover credentials via a DBI connection.",
  "id": "GHSA-4jw9-fvm9-j437",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T03:57:56Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:57:56Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-4781"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37553"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/10201"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.tekuva.com/index.php?option=com_docman\u0026task=doc_details\u0026gid=40\u0026Itemid=9"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…