GHSA-4C72-MRHF-23CG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:52 – Updated: 2023-08-15 22:11
VLAI?
Summary
Apache Syncope uses a weak PNRG
Details
Apache Syncope 1.1.x before 1.1.8 uses weak random values to generate passwords, which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the password via a brute force attack.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.syncope:syncope"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.1.0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.1.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-3503"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-338"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-15T22:11:49Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2014-07-11T14:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Apache Syncope 1.1.x before 1.1.8 uses weak random values to generate passwords, which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the password via a brute force attack.",
"id": "GHSA-4c72-mrhf-23cg",
"modified": "2023-08-15T22:11:49Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:52:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-3503"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/syncope/commit/8e0045925a387ee211832c7e0709dd418cda1ad3"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://syncope.apache.org/security.html#cve-2014-3503-insecure-random-implementations-used-to-generate-p"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20140728093808/http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/68431"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20201207014021/http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/532669/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/127375/Apache-Syncope-Insecure-Password-Generation.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision\u0026revision=r1596537"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Apache Syncope uses a weak PNRG"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…