GHSA-3RQ2-3CGX-J4RH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:26 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:26
VLAI?
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the get_answer function in mmsh.c in libmms before 0.6.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long line in an MMS over HTTP (MMSH) server response.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-2892"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-04-22T14:23:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the get_answer function in mmsh.c in libmms before 0.6.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long line in an MMS over HTTP (MMSH) server response.",
"id": "GHSA-3rq2-3cgx-j4rh",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:26:15Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:26:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-2892"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/92640"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201612-29"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-05/msg00001.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/57875"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://sourceforge.net/p/libmms/code/ci/03bcfccc22919c72742b7338d02859962861e0e8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://sourceforge.net/p/libmms/code/ci/master/tree/ChangeLog"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-2916"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/18/14"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/66933"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…