GHSA-3FX4-7F69-5MMG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2021-06-23 17:14 – Updated: 2021-05-20 16:26
VLAI?
Summary
Integer Overflow in go-jose
Details
go-jose before 1.0.5 suffers from a CBC-HMAC integer overflow on 32-bit architectures. An integer overflow could lead to authentication bypass for CBC-HMAC encrypted ciphertexts on 32-bit architectures.
Severity ?
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/square/go-jose"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-9123"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2021-05-20T16:26:07Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "go-jose before 1.0.5 suffers from a CBC-HMAC integer overflow on 32-bit architectures. An integer overflow could lead to authentication bypass for CBC-HMAC encrypted ciphertexts on 32-bit architectures.",
"id": "GHSA-3fx4-7f69-5mmg",
"modified": "2021-05-20T16:26:07Z",
"published": "2021-06-23T17:14:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-9123"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/789a4c4bd4c118f7564954f441b29c153ccd6a96"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/165170"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2020-0009"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Integer Overflow in go-jose"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…