GHSA-2XXX-FHC8-9QVQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-12 19:42 – Updated: 2026-01-22 20:38
VLAI?
Summary
Ecto missing `is_nil` requirement
Details
Ecto will not raise on queries with non-explicit nil comparisons (ie if they aren't checked with is_nil).
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical)
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Hex",
"name": "ecto"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.2.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"2.2.0"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-20166"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2022-04-12T19:42:45Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Ecto will not raise on queries with non-explicit nil comparisons (ie if they aren\u0027t checked with `is_nil`).",
"id": "GHSA-2xxx-fhc8-9qvq",
"modified": "2026-01-22T20:38:59Z",
"published": "2022-04-12T19:42:45Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-20166"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-ecto/ecto/pull/2125"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-ecto/ecto/commit/db55b0cba6525c24ebddc88ef9ae0c1c00620250"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-ecto/ecto"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/elixir-ecto/0m4NPfg_MMU"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Ecto missing `is_nil` requirement"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…