GHSA-2J3P-GQW5-G59J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-02 17:44 – Updated: 2026-03-02 21:59Impact
Vulnerability Type: Local Privilege Escalation (LPE) / Improper Privilege Management / Arbitrary Command Execution.
The application automatically re-executes the previously failed command but does not properly drop elevated privileges during this process.
When the tool is executed with sudo or otherwise runs with an effective UID of root, it records the last executed command and attempts to rerun it. However, the application fails to restore the original unprivileged user context before re-executing the command. As a result, the retried command is executed with root privileges, even if the original command was issued by an unprivileged user.
This allows a local attacker to intentionally trigger a failed command under elevated execution and gain arbitrary command execution as root via the retry mechanism.
Who is impacted:
Any system where this tool is executed with elevated privileges is affected. The risk is especially high in environments where the tool is permitted to run via sudo, including configurations with NOPASSWD, as an unprivileged user can escalate privileges to root without additional interaction.
Proof of Concept
To verify the vulnerability without a shell, attempt to create a file in a root-protected directory.
1. Verify the file does not exist
sudo ls /root/proof_of_lpe
# Output: No such file or directory
2. Run the vulnerable command
sudo bash -c "SH_PREV_CMD='touch /root/proof_of_lpe' target/release/theshit fix"
3. Check if the file was created by root
sudo ls -l /root/proof_of_lpe
Expected Result:
The command succeeds silently, and the file /root/proof_of_lpe is created, confirming arbitrary command execution with root privileges.
Patches
The issue has been fixed in version 0.1.2.
The patch ensures that privilege levels are correctly handled during command re-execution. Before retrying any previously executed command, the application now explicitly resets the effective UID and GID to the original invoking user.
Workarounds
If upgrading is not possible, users should avoid executing the application with sudo or as the root user.
As a temporary mitigation, administrators should restrict the use of the tool in privileged contexts and ensure it is not included in sudoers configurations, particularly with NOPASSWD. Running the tool strictly as an unprivileged user prevents exploitation of the retry mechanism.
References
- Commit fixing the issue
- CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management
- CWE-273: Improper Check for Dropped Privileges
- CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "crates.io",
"name": "theshit"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.2.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-21882"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-250",
"CWE-269",
"CWE-273"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-02T17:44:53Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-02T20:16:26Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\n**Vulnerability Type:** Local Privilege Escalation (LPE) / Improper Privilege Management / Arbitrary Command Execution.\n\nThe application automatically re-executes the previously failed command but does not properly drop elevated privileges during this process.\n\nWhen the tool is executed with `sudo` or otherwise runs with an effective UID of root, it records the last executed command and attempts to rerun it. However, the application fails to restore the original unprivileged user context before re-executing the command. As a result, the retried command is executed with root privileges, even if the original command was issued by an unprivileged user.\n\nThis allows a local attacker to intentionally trigger a failed command under elevated execution and gain arbitrary command execution as root via the retry mechanism.\n\n**Who is impacted:**\nAny system where this tool is executed with elevated privileges is affected. The risk is especially high in environments where the tool is permitted to run via `sudo`, including configurations with `NOPASSWD`, as an unprivileged user can escalate privileges to root without additional interaction.\n\n### Proof of Concept\n\nTo verify the vulnerability without a shell, attempt to create a file in a root-protected directory.\n\n**1. Verify the file does not exist**\n```bash\nsudo ls /root/proof_of_lpe\n# Output: No such file or directory\n```\n\n**2. Run the vulnerable command**\n```bash\nsudo bash -c \"SH_PREV_CMD=\u0027touch /root/proof_of_lpe\u0027 target/release/theshit fix\"\n```\n\n**3. Check if the file was created by root**\n```bash\nsudo ls -l /root/proof_of_lpe\n```\n\n**Expected Result:**\nThe command succeeds silently, and the file `/root/proof_of_lpe` is created, confirming arbitrary command execution with root privileges.\n\n### Patches\n\nThe issue has been fixed in version **0.1.2**.\n\nThe patch ensures that privilege levels are correctly handled during command re-execution. Before retrying any previously executed command, the application now explicitly resets the effective UID and GID to the original invoking user.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nIf upgrading is not possible, users should avoid executing the application with `sudo` or as the root user.\n\nAs a temporary mitigation, administrators should restrict the use of the tool in privileged contexts and ensure it is not included in `sudoers` configurations, particularly with `NOPASSWD`. Running the tool strictly as an unprivileged user prevents exploitation of the retry mechanism.\n\n### References\n\n* [Commit fixing the issue](https://github.com/AsfhtgkDavid/theshit/commit/5293957b119e55212dce2c6dcbaf1d7eb794602a)\n* CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management\n* CWE-273: Improper Check for Dropped Privileges\n* CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges",
"id": "GHSA-2j3p-gqw5-g59j",
"modified": "2026-03-02T21:59:23Z",
"published": "2026-03-02T17:44:53Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/AsfhtgkDavid/theshit/security/advisories/GHSA-2j3p-gqw5-g59j"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-21882"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/AsfhtgkDavid/theshit/commit/5293957b119e55212dce2c6dcbaf1d7eb794602a"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/AsfhtgkDavid/theshit"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "theshit\u0027s Improper Privilege Dropping Allows Local Privilege Escalation via Command Re-execution"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.