GHSA-27JC-JMP8-QFW5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-06 21:30 – Updated: 2026-02-09 12:30
VLAI?
Summary
Duplicate Advisory: Keylime Missing Authentication for Critical Function and Improper Authentication
Details

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-4jqp-9qjv-57m2. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

A flaw was found in Keylime. The Keylime registrar, since version 7.12.0, does not enforce client-side Transport Layer Security (TLS) authentication. This authentication bypass vulnerability allows unauthenticated clients with network access to perform administrative operations, including listing agents, retrieving public Trusted Platform Module (TPM) data, and deleting agents, by connecting without presenting a client certificate.

Severity ?
9.4 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "keylime"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "7.12.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "7.12.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "keylime"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "7.13.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "7.13.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "7.13.0"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-322"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-02-06T22:33:06Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-02-06T20:16:09Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "### Duplicate Advisory\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-4jqp-9qjv-57m2. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n### Original Description\nA flaw was found in Keylime. The Keylime registrar, since version 7.12.0, does not enforce client-side Transport Layer Security (TLS) authentication. This authentication bypass vulnerability allows unauthenticated clients with network access to perform administrative operations, including listing agents, retrieving public Trusted Platform Module (TPM) data, and deleting agents, by connecting without presenting a client certificate.",
  "id": "GHSA-27jc-jmp8-qfw5",
  "modified": "2026-02-09T12:30:21Z",
  "published": "2026-02-06T21:30:49Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-1709"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2224"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2225"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2298"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-1709"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2435514"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Duplicate Advisory: Keylime Missing Authentication for Critical Function and Improper Authentication",
  "withdrawn": "2026-02-06T22:33:06Z"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.