GHSA-24MJ-MJX2-Q6G9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:01 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:01
VLAI?
Details

CSL DualCom GPRS CS2300-R devices with firmware 1.25 through 3.53 use the same 001984 default PIN across different customers' installations, which allows remote attackers to execute commands by leveraging knowledge of this PIN and including it in an SMS message.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2015-7287"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-11-25T04:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "CSL DualCom GPRS CS2300-R devices with firmware 1.25 through 3.53 use the same 001984 default PIN across different customers\u0027 installations, which allows remote attackers to execute commands by leveraging knowledge of this PIN and including it in an SMS message.",
  "id": "GHSA-24mj-mjx2-q6g9",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T04:01:26Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:01:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-7287"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://cybergibbons.com/?p=2844"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/428280"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/BLUU-A3NQAL"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…