GHSA-2299-GHJR-6VJP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-24 19:48 – Updated: 2026-03-24 19:48
VLAI?
Summary
Parse Server: MFA recovery code single-use bypass via concurrent requests
Details

Impact

An attacker who obtains a user's password and a single MFA recovery code can reuse that recovery code an unlimited number of times by sending concurrent login requests. This defeats the single-use design of recovery codes. The attack requires the user's password, a valid recovery code, and the ability to send concurrent requests within milliseconds.

Patches

The login handler now uses optimistic locking when updating auth data that contains consumed single-use tokens. If a concurrent request has already modified the recovery array, the update fails and the login is rejected.

Workarounds

There are no known workarounds.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "parse-server"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "9.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "9.6.0-alpha.54"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "parse-server"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "8.6.60"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-33624"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-367"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-24T19:48:24Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n\nAn attacker who obtains a user\u0027s password and a single MFA recovery code can reuse that recovery code an unlimited number of times by sending concurrent login requests. This defeats the single-use design of recovery codes. The attack requires the user\u0027s password, a valid recovery code, and the ability to send concurrent requests within milliseconds.\n\n### Patches\n\nThe login handler now uses optimistic locking when updating auth data that contains consumed single-use tokens. If a concurrent request has already modified the recovery array, the update fails and the login is rejected.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThere are no known workarounds.",
  "id": "GHSA-2299-ghjr-6vjp",
  "modified": "2026-03-24T19:48:25Z",
  "published": "2026-03-24T19:48:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server/security/advisories/GHSA-2299-ghjr-6vjp"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server/pull/10275"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server/pull/10276"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Parse Server: MFA recovery code single-use bypass via concurrent requests"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…