GCVE-1-2026-0033 (CVE-2026-9084)

Vulnerability from gna-1 – Published: 2026-05-20 14:22 – Updated: 2026-05-20 15:11
VLAI?
Title
MISP OIDC authentication bypass via automatic email-based account linking under insecure IdP configurations
Summary
MISP’s OIDC authentication plugin allowed automatic linking of an OIDC identity to an existing local user account based on the email claim when the local account had no stored sub value. Under insecure or untrusted IdP configurations where email ownership is not enforced, an attacker with a valid OIDC token could assert a victim’s email address and authenticate as that user, leading to account takeover.
CWE
  • CWE-287 - Improper Authentication
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
misp misp Affected: 2.5.0 , ≤ 2.5.37 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
Ali Ganiyev Luciano Righetti
Relationships ?

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "misp",
          "vendor": "misp",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2.5.37",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "2.5.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Ali Ganiyev"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "value": "Luciano Righetti"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "MISP\u2019s OIDC authentication plugin allowed automatic linking of an OIDC identity to an existing local user account based on the \u003ccode\u003eemail\u003c/code\u003e claim when the local account had no stored \u003ccode\u003esub\u003c/code\u003e value. Under insecure or untrusted IdP configurations where email ownership is not enforced, an attacker with a valid OIDC token could assert a victim\u2019s email address and authenticate as that user, leading to account takeover.\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "MISP\u2019s OIDC authentication plugin allowed automatic linking of an OIDC identity to an existing local user account based on the email claim when the local account had no stored sub value. Under insecure or untrusted IdP configurations where email ownership is not enforced, an attacker with a valid OIDC token could assert a victim\u2019s email address and authenticate as that user, leading to account takeover."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-115",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-115 Authentication Bypass"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
            "attackVector": "ADJACENT",
            "baseScore": 6,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-287",
              "description": "CWE-287 Improper Authentication",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "orgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/71f5662c1b5886613d2cd5c72fd93bb4ca6fa172"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "MISP OIDC authentication bypass via automatic email-based account linking under insecure IdP configurations",
      "x_gcve": [
        {
          "recordType": "advisory",
          "vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-0033"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-9084",
    "datePublished": "2026-05-20T14:22:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-05-20T15:11:36.782113Z",
    "requesterUserId": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
    "serial": 1,
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-0033",
    "vulnerabilitylookup_history": [
      [
        "alexandre.dulaunoy@circl.lu",
        "2026-05-20T14:22:36.885719Z"
      ],
      [
        "cedric.bonhomme@circl.lu",
        "2026-05-20T14:46:10.350476Z"
      ],
      [
        "alexandre.dulaunoy@circl.lu",
        "2026-05-20T15:11:36.782113Z"
      ]
    ]
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…