FKIE_CVE-2026-4370

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-04-01 09:16 - Updated: 2026-06-17 10:56
Summary
A vulnerability was identified in Juju from version 3.2.0 until 3.6.19 and from version 4.0 until 4.0.4, where the internal Dqlite database cluster fails to perform proper TLS client and server authentication. Specifically, the Juju controller's database endpoint does not validate client certificates when a new node attempts to join the cluster. An unauthenticated attacker with network reachability to the Juju controller's Dqlite port can exploit this flaw to join the database cluster. Once joined, the attacker gains full read and write access to the underlying database, allowing for total data compromise.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
canonical juju *
canonical juju *

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://github.com/juju/",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "juju",
          "platforms": [
            "Linux"
          ],
          "product": "Juju",
          "repo": "https://github.com/juju/juju",
          "vendor": "Canonical",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "3.6.20",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.2.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            },
            {
              "lessThan": "4.0.4",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "4.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@ubuntu.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:canonical:juju:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "C1E8860B-D8C6-4795-A4F8-5EA1E8CB2381",
              "versionEndExcluding": "3.6.20",
              "versionStartIncluding": "3.2.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:canonical:juju:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "D900BC29-F5B7-4485-BB1D-42E9778D0A82",
              "versionEndExcluding": "4.0.5",
              "versionStartIncluding": "4.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A vulnerability was identified in Juju from version 3.2.0 until 3.6.19 and from version 4.0 until 4.0.4, where the internal Dqlite database cluster fails to perform proper TLS client and server authentication. Specifically, the Juju controller\u0027s database endpoint does not validate client certificates when a new node attempts to join the cluster. An unauthenticated attacker with network reachability to the Juju controller\u0027s Dqlite port can exploit this flaw to join the database cluster. Once joined, the attacker gains full read and write access to the underlying database, allowing for total data compromise."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-4370",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:56:29.457",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 10.0,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 6.0,
        "source": "security@ubuntu.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-4370",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "poc"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "total"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-04-01T13:00:31.628747Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-04-01T09:16:17.717",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@ubuntu.com",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/juju/juju/security/advisories/GHSA-gvrj-cjch-728p"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@ubuntu.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-295"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-306"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@ubuntu.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    },
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-295"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.