FKIE_CVE-2026-43067

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-05-05 16:16 - Updated: 2026-05-20 23:16
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: handle wraparound when searching for blocks for indirect mapped blocks Commit 4865c768b563 ("ext4: always allocate blocks only from groups inode can use") restricts what blocks will be allocated for indirect block based files to block numbers that fit within 32-bit block numbers. However, when using a review bot running on the latest Gemini LLM to check this commit when backporting into an LTS based kernel, it raised this concern: If ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group is >= ngroups (for instance, if the goal group was populated via stream allocation from s_mb_last_groups), then start will be >= ngroups. Does this allow allocating blocks beyond the 32-bit limit for indirect block mapped files? The commit message mentions that ext4_mb_scan_groups_linear() takes care to not select unsupported groups. However, its loop uses group = *start, and the very first iteration will call ext4_mb_scan_group() with this unsupported group because next_linear_group() is only called at the end of the iteration. After reviewing the code paths involved and considering the LLM review, I determined that this can happen when there is a file system where some files/directories are extent-mapped and others are indirect-block mapped. To address this, add a safety clamp in ext4_mb_scan_groups().
Impacted products

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "65BC3363-9FA5-4980-B120-042521BD0F34",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.16",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.15.203",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "B71F66A1-26CE-4A17-BBAB-34A1AE897567",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.134",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.6.130",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "C8D55175-C5FF-47BC-BC65-A2B06E3021A1",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.80",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.12.77",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "DEA57E4E-36B0-40D5-98B9-6A50348C9E74",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.18.21",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.18.14",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "A67B0458-DAE3-4940-BBB2-1A4D263AF27B",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.19.11",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.19.4",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.1.167:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "B898A4FB-4E74-40F7-B523-B71FFB681B6D",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: handle wraparound when searching for blocks for indirect mapped blocks\n\nCommit 4865c768b563 (\"ext4: always allocate blocks only from groups\ninode can use\") restricts what blocks will be allocated for indirect\nblock based files to block numbers that fit within 32-bit block\nnumbers.\n\nHowever, when using a review bot running on the latest Gemini LLM to\ncheck this commit when backporting into an LTS based kernel, it raised\nthis concern:\n\n   If ac-\u003eac_g_ex.fe_group is \u003e= ngroups (for instance, if the goal\n   group was populated via stream allocation from s_mb_last_groups),\n   then start will be \u003e= ngroups.\n\n   Does this allow allocating blocks beyond the 32-bit limit for\n   indirect block mapped files? The commit message mentions that\n   ext4_mb_scan_groups_linear() takes care to not select unsupported\n   groups. However, its loop uses group = *start, and the very first\n   iteration will call ext4_mb_scan_group() with this unsupported\n   group because next_linear_group() is only called at the end of the\n   iteration.\n\nAfter reviewing the code paths involved and considering the LLM\nreview, I determined that this can happen when there is a file system\nwhere some files/directories are extent-mapped and others are\nindirect-block mapped.  To address this, add a safety clamp in\next4_mb_scan_groups()."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-43067",
  "lastModified": "2026-05-20T23:16:20.980",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 9.8,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-05-05T16:16:15.937",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12624c5b724a81e14e532972b40d863b0de3b7d1"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2a368ccddfc492a0aa951e2caef2985f20e96503"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4bec4a498ce86314d470ae6144120461f2138c29"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83170a05908b6cf2fb3235d3065bf613ff866f3c"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bb81702370fad22c06ca12b6e1648754dbc37e0f"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f89bba144938921a2249237ad04a0183ff3f8930"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…