FKIE_CVE-2026-32666

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-21 00:16 - Updated: 2026-03-23 16:16
Severity
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Summary
WebCTRL systems that communicate over BACnet inherit the protocol's lack of network layer authentication. WebCTRL does not implement additional validation of BACnet traffic so an attacker with network access could spoof BACnet packets directed at either the WebCTRL server or associated AutomatedLogic controllers. Spoofed packets may be processed as legitimate.
References
ics-cert@hq.dhs.govhttps://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-078-08.json
ics-cert@hq.dhs.govhttps://www.automatedlogic.com/en/company/security-commitment/
ics-cert@hq.dhs.govhttps://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-078-08
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [
    {
      "sourceIdentifier": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
      "tags": [
        "unsupported-when-assigned"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "WebCTRL systems that communicate over BACnet inherit the protocol\u0027s lack\n of network layer authentication. WebCTRL does not implement additional \nvalidation of BACnet traffic so an attacker with network access could \nspoof BACnet packets directed at either the WebCTRL server or associated\n AutomatedLogic controllers. Spoofed packets may be processed as \nlegitimate."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Los sistemas WebCTRL que se comunican a trav\u00e9s de BACnet heredan la falta de autenticaci\u00f3n de capa de red del protocolo. WebCTRL no implementa validaci\u00f3n adicional del tr\u00e1fico BACnet, por lo que un atacante con acceso a la red podr\u00eda falsificar paquetes BACnet dirigidos tanto al servidor WebCTRL como a los controladores AutomatedLogic asociados. Los paquetes falsificados pueden ser procesados como leg\u00edtimos."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-32666",
  "lastModified": "2026-03-23T16:16:47.220",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-03-21T00:16:26.220",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
      "url": "https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-078-08.json"
    },
    {
      "source": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
      "url": "https://www.automatedlogic.com/en/company/security-commitment/"
    },
    {
      "source": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
      "url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-078-08"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-290"
        }
      ],
      "source": "ics-cert@hq.dhs.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    },
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-290"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.