FKIE_CVE-2026-3190
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-26 19:17 - Updated: 2026-04-02 14:16
Severity ?
Summary
A flaw was found in Keycloak. The User-Managed Access (UMA) 2.0 Protection API endpoint for permission tickets fails to enforce the `uma_protection` role check. This allows any authenticated user with a token issued for a resource server client, even without the `uma_protection` role, to enumerate all permission tickets in the system. This vulnerability partial leads to information disclosure.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | build_of_keycloak | - |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:build_of_keycloak:-:*:*:*:-:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "E5C930CB-4EAD-497B-A44B-D880F2A1F85B",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A flaw was found in Keycloak. The User-Managed Access (UMA) 2.0 Protection API endpoint for permission tickets fails to enforce the `uma_protection` role check. This allows any authenticated user with a token issued for a resource server client, even without the `uma_protection` role, to enumerate all permission tickets in the system. This vulnerability partial leads to information disclosure."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Se encontr\u00f3 una falla en Keycloak. El endpoint de la API de protecci\u00f3n de User-Managed Access (UMA) 2.0 para tickets de permiso no aplica la verificaci\u00f3n del rol \u0027uma_protection\u0027. Esto permite que cualquier usuario autenticado con un token emitido para un cliente de servidor de recursos, incluso sin el rol \u0027uma_protection\u0027, enumere todos los tickets de permiso en el sistema. Esta vulnerabilidad conduce parcialmente a la revelaci\u00f3n de informaci\u00f3n."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-3190",
"lastModified": "2026-04-02T14:16:31.917",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-03-26T19:17:06.413",
"references": [
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6477"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6478"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-3190"
},
{
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2442572"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-280"
}
],
"source": "secalert@redhat.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…