FKIE_CVE-2026-31435

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-04-22 14:16 - Updated: 2026-04-23 16:17
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix read abandonment during retry Under certain circumstances, all the remaining subrequests from a read request will get abandoned during retry. The abandonment process expects the 'subreq' variable to be set to the place to start abandonment from, but it doesn't always have a useful value (it will be uninitialised on the first pass through the loop and it may point to a deleted subrequest on later passes). Fix the first jump to "abandon:" to set subreq to the start of the first subrequest expected to need retry (which, in this abandonment case, turned out unexpectedly to no longer have NEED_RETRY set). Also clear the subreq pointer after discarding superfluous retryable subrequests to cause an oops if we do try to access it.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfs: Fix read abandonment during retry\n\nUnder certain circumstances, all the remaining subrequests from a read\nrequest will get abandoned during retry.  The abandonment process expects\nthe \u0027subreq\u0027 variable to be set to the place to start abandonment from, but\nit doesn\u0027t always have a useful value (it will be uninitialised on the\nfirst pass through the loop and it may point to a deleted subrequest on\nlater passes).\n\nFix the first jump to \"abandon:\" to set subreq to the start of the first\nsubrequest expected to need retry (which, in this abandonment case, turned\nout unexpectedly to no longer have NEED_RETRY set).\n\nAlso clear the subreq pointer after discarding superfluous retryable\nsubrequests to cause an oops if we do try to access it."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-31435",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-23T16:17:41.280",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2026-04-22T14:16:36.710",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e5fd8f53b575ff2188f82071da19c977ca56c41"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e57523490cd2efb52b1ea97f2e0a74c0fb634cd"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f2f2bd128a8d9edbc1e785760da54ada3df69b7"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…