FKIE_CVE-2026-23326

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-25 11:16 - Updated: 2026-04-23 21:11
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xsk: Fix fragment node deletion to prevent buffer leak After commit b692bf9a7543 ("xsk: Get rid of xdp_buff_xsk::xskb_list_node"), the list_node field is reused for both the xskb pool list and the buffer free list, this causes a buffer leak as described below. xp_free() checks if a buffer is already on the free list using list_empty(&xskb->list_node). When list_del() is used to remove a node from the xskb pool list, it doesn't reinitialize the node pointers. This means list_empty() will return false even after the node has been removed, causing xp_free() to incorrectly skip adding the buffer to the free list. Fix this by using list_del_init() instead of list_del() in all fragment handling paths, this ensures the list node is reinitialized after removal, allowing the list_empty() to work correctly.

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "40E7536C-DA22-4B7D-9953-0343B4D9A3E6",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.18.17",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.13.1",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "69245D10-0B71-485E-80C3-A64F077004D3",
              "versionEndExcluding": "6.19.7",
              "versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "5A3F9505-6B98-4269-8B81-127E55A1BF00",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F253B622-8837-4245-BCE5-A7BF8FC76A16",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "4AE85AD8-4641-4E7C-A2F4-305E2CD9EE64",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F666C8D8-6538-46D4-B318-87610DE64C34",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "02259FDA-961B-47BC-AE7F-93D7EC6E90C2",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "58A9FEFF-C040-420D-8F0A-BFDAAA1DF258",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "1D2315C0-D46F-4F85-9754-F9E5E11374A6",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc7:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "512EE3A8-A590-4501-9A94-5D4B268D6138",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxsk: Fix fragment node deletion to prevent buffer leak\n\nAfter commit b692bf9a7543 (\"xsk: Get rid of xdp_buff_xsk::xskb_list_node\"),\nthe list_node field is reused for both the xskb pool list and the buffer\nfree list, this causes a buffer leak as described below.\n\nxp_free() checks if a buffer is already on the free list using\nlist_empty(\u0026xskb-\u003elist_node). When list_del() is used to remove a node\nfrom the xskb pool list, it doesn\u0027t reinitialize the node pointers.\nThis means list_empty() will return false even after the node has been\nremoved, causing xp_free() to incorrectly skip adding the buffer to the\nfree list.\n\nFix this by using list_del_init() instead of list_del() in all fragment\nhandling paths, this ensures the list node is reinitialized after removal,\nallowing the list_empty() to work correctly."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "En el kernel de Linux, la siguiente vulnerabilidad ha sido resuelta:\n\nxsk: Corrige la eliminaci\u00f3n de nodos de fragmento para prevenir una fuga de b\u00fafer\n\nDespu\u00e9s del commit b692bf9a7543 (\u0027xsk: Elimina xdp_buff_xsk::xskb_list_node\u0027), el campo list_node se reutiliza tanto para la lista de la piscina xskb como para la lista de b\u00faferes libres, esto causa una fuga de b\u00fafer como se describe a continuaci\u00f3n.\n\nxp_free() comprueba si un b\u00fafer ya est\u00e1 en la lista de libres usando list_empty(\u0026amp;xskb-\u0026gt;list_node). Cuando se usa list_del() para eliminar un nodo de la lista de la piscina xskb, no reinicializa los punteros del nodo. Esto significa que list_empty() devolver\u00e1 falso incluso despu\u00e9s de que el nodo haya sido eliminado, causando que xp_free() omita incorrectamente a\u00f1adir el b\u00fafer a la lista de libres.\n\nSoluciona esto usando list_del_init() en lugar de list_del() en todas las rutas de manejo de fragmentos, esto asegura que el nodo de la lista se reinicialice despu\u00e9s de la eliminaci\u00f3n, permitiendo que list_empty() funcione correctamente."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-23326",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-23T21:11:17.750",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.8,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-03-25T11:16:29.687",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2a9ea988465ece5b6896b1bdc144170a64e84c35"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5172adf9efb8298a52f4dcdc3f98d4d9d1e06a6d"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/60abb0ac11dccd6b98fd9182bc5f85b621688861"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/645c6d8376ad4913cbffe0e0c2cca0c4febbe596"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b38cbd4af5034635cff109e08788c63f956f3a69"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-787"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…