FKIE_CVE-2026-23316
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-25 11:16 - Updated: 2026-04-23 21:07
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: ipv4: fix ARM64 alignment fault in multipath hash seed
`struct sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_seed` contains two u32 fields
(user_seed and mp_seed), making it an 8-byte structure with a 4-byte
alignment requirement.
In `fib_multipath_hash_from_keys()`, the code evaluates the entire
struct atomically via `READ_ONCE()`:
mp_seed = READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_seed).mp_seed;
While this silently works on GCC by falling back to unaligned regular
loads which the ARM64 kernel tolerates, it causes a fatal kernel panic
when compiled with Clang and LTO enabled.
Commit e35123d83ee3 ("arm64: lto: Strengthen READ_ONCE() to acquire
when CONFIG_LTO=y") strengthens `READ_ONCE()` to use Load-Acquire
instructions (`ldar` / `ldapr`) to prevent compiler reordering bugs
under Clang LTO. Since the macro evaluates the full 8-byte struct,
Clang emits a 64-bit `ldar` instruction. ARM64 architecture strictly
requires `ldar` to be naturally aligned, thus executing it on a 4-byte
aligned address triggers a strict Alignment Fault (FSC = 0x21).
Fix the read side by moving the `READ_ONCE()` directly to the `u32`
member, which emits a safe 32-bit `ldar Wn`.
Furthermore, Eric Dumazet pointed out that `WRITE_ONCE()` on the entire
struct in `proc_fib_multipath_hash_set_seed()` is also flawed. Analysis
shows that Clang splits this 8-byte write into two separate 32-bit
`str` instructions. While this avoids an alignment fault, it destroys
atomicity and exposes a tear-write vulnerability. Fix this by
explicitly splitting the write into two 32-bit `WRITE_ONCE()`
operations.
Finally, add the missing `READ_ONCE()` when reading `user_seed` in
`proc_fib_multipath_hash_seed()` to ensure proper pairing and
concurrency safety.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | * | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.11 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 | |
| linux | linux_kernel | 7.0 |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A9108695-408B-4C1A-A58A-9B59404F6DEE",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.12.77",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.11.1",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "A5E006E4-59C7-43C1-9231-62A72219F2BA",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.18.17",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.13",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "69245D10-0B71-485E-80C3-A64F077004D3",
"versionEndExcluding": "6.19.7",
"versionStartIncluding": "6.19",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.11:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4770BA57-3F3F-493B-8608-EC3B25254949",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F253B622-8837-4245-BCE5-A7BF8FC76A16",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4AE85AD8-4641-4E7C-A2F4-305E2CD9EE64",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F666C8D8-6538-46D4-B318-87610DE64C34",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "02259FDA-961B-47BC-AE7F-93D7EC6E90C2",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "58A9FEFF-C040-420D-8F0A-BFDAAA1DF258",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "1D2315C0-D46F-4F85-9754-F9E5E11374A6",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc7:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "512EE3A8-A590-4501-9A94-5D4B268D6138",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: ipv4: fix ARM64 alignment fault in multipath hash seed\n\n`struct sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_seed` contains two u32 fields\n(user_seed and mp_seed), making it an 8-byte structure with a 4-byte\nalignment requirement.\n\nIn `fib_multipath_hash_from_keys()`, the code evaluates the entire\nstruct atomically via `READ_ONCE()`:\n\n mp_seed = READ_ONCE(net-\u003eipv4.sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_seed).mp_seed;\n\nWhile this silently works on GCC by falling back to unaligned regular\nloads which the ARM64 kernel tolerates, it causes a fatal kernel panic\nwhen compiled with Clang and LTO enabled.\n\nCommit e35123d83ee3 (\"arm64: lto: Strengthen READ_ONCE() to acquire\nwhen CONFIG_LTO=y\") strengthens `READ_ONCE()` to use Load-Acquire\ninstructions (`ldar` / `ldapr`) to prevent compiler reordering bugs\nunder Clang LTO. Since the macro evaluates the full 8-byte struct,\nClang emits a 64-bit `ldar` instruction. ARM64 architecture strictly\nrequires `ldar` to be naturally aligned, thus executing it on a 4-byte\naligned address triggers a strict Alignment Fault (FSC = 0x21).\n\nFix the read side by moving the `READ_ONCE()` directly to the `u32`\nmember, which emits a safe 32-bit `ldar Wn`.\n\nFurthermore, Eric Dumazet pointed out that `WRITE_ONCE()` on the entire\nstruct in `proc_fib_multipath_hash_set_seed()` is also flawed. Analysis\nshows that Clang splits this 8-byte write into two separate 32-bit\n`str` instructions. While this avoids an alignment fault, it destroys\natomicity and exposes a tear-write vulnerability. Fix this by\nexplicitly splitting the write into two 32-bit `WRITE_ONCE()`\noperations.\n\nFinally, add the missing `READ_ONCE()` when reading `user_seed` in\n`proc_fib_multipath_hash_seed()` to ensure proper pairing and\nconcurrency safety."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "En el kernel de Linux, la siguiente vulnerabilidad ha sido resuelta:\n\nnet: ipv4: solucionar fallo de alineaci\u00f3n ARM64 en la semilla de hash multipath\n\n\u0027struct sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_seed\u0027 contiene dos campos u32 (user_seed y mp_seed), convirti\u00e9ndola en una estructura de 8 bytes con un requisito de alineaci\u00f3n de 4 bytes.\n\nEn \u0027fib_multipath_hash_from_keys()\u0027, el c\u00f3digo eval\u00faa la estructura completa at\u00f3micamente a trav\u00e9s de \u0027READ_ONCE()\u0027:\n\n mp_seed = \u0027READ_ONCE\u0027(net-\u0026gt;ipv4.sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_seed).mp_seed;\n\nAunque esto funciona silenciosamente en GCC al recurrir a cargas regulares no alineadas que el kernel ARM64 tolera, causa un p\u00e1nico fatal del kernel cuando se compila con Clang y LTO habilitado.\n\nEl commit e35123d83ee3 (\u0027arm64: lto: Strengthen \u0027READ_ONCE()\u0027 to acquire when CONFIG_LTO=y\u0027) refuerza \u0027READ_ONCE()\u0027 para usar instrucciones Load-Acquire (\u0027ldar\u0027 / \u0027ldapr\u0027) para prevenir errores de reordenamiento del compilador bajo Clang LTO. Dado que la macro eval\u00faa la estructura completa de 8 bytes, Clang emite una instrucci\u00f3n \u0027ldar\u0027 de 64 bits. La arquitectura ARM64 requiere estrictamente que \u0027ldar\u0027 est\u00e9 naturalmente alineado, por lo tanto, ejecutarlo en una direcci\u00f3n alineada a 4 bytes desencadena un fallo de alineaci\u00f3n estricto (FSC = 0x21).\n\nSolucionar el lado de lectura moviendo \u0027READ_ONCE()\u0027 directamente al miembro \u0027u32\u0027, lo que emite un \u0027ldar Wn\u0027 seguro de 32 bits.\n\nAdem\u00e1s, Eric Dumazet se\u00f1al\u00f3 que \u0027WRITE_ONCE()\u0027 en la estructura completa en \u0027proc_fib_multipath_hash_set_seed()\u0027 tambi\u00e9n es defectuoso. El an\u00e1lisis muestra que Clang divide esta escritura de 8 bytes en dos instrucciones \u0027str\u0027 separadas de 32 bits. Aunque esto evita un fallo de alineaci\u00f3n, destruye la atomicidad y expone una vulnerabilidad de escritura fragmentada. Solucionar esto dividiendo expl\u00edcitamente la escritura en dos operaciones \u0027WRITE_ONCE()\u0027 de 32 bits.\n\nFinalmente, a\u00f1adir el \u0027READ_ONCE()\u0027 faltante al leer \u0027user_seed\u0027 en \u0027proc_fib_multipath_hash_seed()\u0027 para asegurar un emparejamiento adecuado y seguridad de concurrencia."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-23316",
"lastModified": "2026-04-23T21:07:02.380",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-03-25T11:16:28.063",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4bdc94d45d5459f0149085dfc1efe733c8e14f11"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4ee7fa6cf78ff26d783d39e2949d14c4c1cd5e7f"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/607e923a3c1b2120de430b3dcde25ed8ad213c0a"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e4ad34a8889a6a9e0f6cc7c55d02161fe31a199"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "NVD-CWE-noinfo"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…