FKIE_CVE-2026-23255
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-18 18:16 - Updated: 2026-03-19 13:25
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: add proper RCU protection to /proc/net/ptype
Yin Fengwei reported an RCU stall in ptype_seq_show() and provided
a patch.
Real issue is that ptype_seq_next() and ptype_seq_show() violate
RCU rules.
ptype_seq_show() runs under rcu_read_lock(), and reads pt->dev
to get device name without any barrier.
At the same time, concurrent writers can remove a packet_type structure
(which is correctly freed after an RCU grace period) and clear pt->dev
without an RCU grace period.
Define ptype_iter_state to carry a dev pointer along seq_net_private:
struct ptype_iter_state {
struct seq_net_private p;
struct net_device *dev; // added in this patch
};
We need to record the device pointer in ptype_get_idx() and
ptype_seq_next() so that ptype_seq_show() is safe against
concurrent pt->dev changes.
We also need to add full RCU protection in ptype_seq_next().
(Missing READ_ONCE() when reading list.next values)
Many thanks to Dong Chenchen for providing a repro.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: add proper RCU protection to /proc/net/ptype\n\nYin Fengwei reported an RCU stall in ptype_seq_show() and provided\na patch.\n\nReal issue is that ptype_seq_next() and ptype_seq_show() violate\nRCU rules.\n\nptype_seq_show() runs under rcu_read_lock(), and reads pt-\u003edev\nto get device name without any barrier.\n\nAt the same time, concurrent writers can remove a packet_type structure\n(which is correctly freed after an RCU grace period) and clear pt-\u003edev\nwithout an RCU grace period.\n\nDefine ptype_iter_state to carry a dev pointer along seq_net_private:\n\nstruct ptype_iter_state {\n\tstruct seq_net_private\tp;\n\tstruct net_device\t*dev; // added in this patch\n};\n\nWe need to record the device pointer in ptype_get_idx() and\nptype_seq_next() so that ptype_seq_show() is safe against\nconcurrent pt-\u003edev changes.\n\nWe also need to add full RCU protection in ptype_seq_next().\n(Missing READ_ONCE() when reading list.next values)\n\nMany thanks to Dong Chenchen for providing a repro."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-23255",
"lastModified": "2026-03-19T13:25:00.570",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-03-18T18:16:23.687",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/589a530ae44d0c80f523fcfd1a15af8087f27d35"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f613e8b4afea0cd17c7168e8b00e25bc8d33175d"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…