FKIE_CVE-2026-20052

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-04 18:16 - Updated: 2026-08-20 16:39
Summary
A vulnerability in the memory management handling for the Snort 3 Detection Engine of Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Snort 3 Detection Engine to restart. This vulnerability is due to a logic error in memory management when a device is performing Snort 3 SSL packet inspection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted SSL packets through an established connection to be parsed by the Snort 3 Detection Engine. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition when the Snort 3 Detection Engine unexpectedly restarts.

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software",
          "vendor": "Cisco",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.4.0"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.4.1"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.4.1.1"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.6.0"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.4.2"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "7.4.2.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@cisco.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_firewall_threat_defense:7.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "5BC88149-095A-41DE-AA27-1CFD21125EF4",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_firewall_threat_defense:7.4.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "BA983223-35AE-4D2F-B2F5-BA0614908C3B",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_firewall_threat_defense:7.4.1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "17A31A33-2E84-4C79-86BD-1E9FF4C1DD09",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_firewall_threat_defense:7.4.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "B58DC884-9430-49D4-AA8B-7FEB7505B7A8",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_firewall_threat_defense:7.4.2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "5EC075D4-0033-46ED-9E55-576997424382",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_firewall_threat_defense:7.6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E91D9CAD-174A-4AAE-AB14-BD3110F9CFA1",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A vulnerability in the memory management handling for the Snort 3 Detection Engine of Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Snort 3 Detection Engine to restart.\r\n\r\nThis vulnerability is due to a logic error in memory management when a device is performing Snort 3 SSL packet inspection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted SSL packets\u0026nbsp;through an established connection to be parsed by the Snort 3 Detection Engine. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition when the Snort 3 Detection Engine unexpectedly restarts."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Una vulnerabilidad en el manejo de la gesti\u00f3n de memoria para el Motor de Detecci\u00f3n Snort 3 del software Cisco Secure Cortafuegos Defensa contra Amenazas (FTD) podr\u00eda permitir a un atacante remoto no autenticado causar que el Motor de Detecci\u00f3n Snort 3 se reinicie.\n\nEsta vulnerabilidad se debe a un error de l\u00f3gica en la gesti\u00f3n de memoria cuando un dispositivo est\u00e1 realizando inspecci\u00f3n de paquetes SSL de Snort 3. Un atacante podr\u00eda explotar esta vulnerabilidad enviando paquetes SSL manipulados a trav\u00e9s de una conexi\u00f3n establecida para ser analizados por el Motor de Detecci\u00f3n Snort 3. Un exploit exitoso podr\u00eda permitir al atacante causar una condici\u00f3n de denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (DoS) cuando el Motor de Detecci\u00f3n Snort 3 se reinicia inesperadamente."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-20052",
  "lastModified": "2026-08-20T16:39:17.133",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 5.8,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-20052",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-03-04T20:46:35.971901Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-03-04T18:16:19.420",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-ftd-snort3ssl-FBEKYXpH"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "psirt@cisco.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-788"
        }
      ],
      "source": "psirt@cisco.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.