FKIE_CVE-2026-1215

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-02-11 09:15 - Updated: 2026-04-15 00:35
Summary
The MMA Call Tracking plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.3.15. This is due to missing nonce validation when saving plugin configuration on the `mma_call_tracking_menu` admin page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify call tracking configuration settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The MMA Call Tracking plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.3.15. This is due to missing nonce validation when saving plugin configuration on the `mma_call_tracking_menu` admin page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify call tracking configuration settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El plugin MMA Call Tracking para WordPress es vulnerable a la falsificaci\u00f3n de petici\u00f3n en sitios cruzados en todas las versiones hasta la 2.3.15, inclusive. Esto se debe a la falta de validaci\u00f3n de nonce al guardar la configuraci\u00f3n del plugin en la p\u00e1gina de administraci\u00f3n \u0027mma_call_tracking_menu\u0027. Esto hace posible que atacantes no autenticados modifiquen la configuraci\u00f3n de seguimiento de llamadas a trav\u00e9s de una petici\u00f3n falsificada, siempre que puedan enga\u00f1ar a un administrador del sitio para que realice una acci\u00f3n como hacer clic en un enlace."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-1215",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-15T00:35:42.020",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-02-11T09:15:51.177",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mma-call-tracking/tags/2.3.15/mma_call_tracking.php#L61"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mma-call-tracking/tags/2.3.15/mma_call_tracking.php#L967"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mma-call-tracking/trunk/mma_call_tracking.php#L61"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/mma-call-tracking/trunk/mma_call_tracking.php#L967"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/5689bd2b-1518-4b3b-81a3-cc92575f6c1f?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…