FKIE_CVE-2026-0909

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-02-03 04:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 10:11
Severity
5.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Summary
The WP ULike plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 4.8.3.1. This is due to the `wp_ulike_delete_history_api` AJAX action not verifying that the log entry being deleted belongs to the current user. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above (granted the 'stats' capability is assigned to their role), to delete arbitrary log entries belonging to other users via the 'id' parameter.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-ulike/tags/4.8.3.1/admin/admin-ajax.php#L94
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-ulike/trunk/admin/admin-ajax.php#L94
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3451296/wp-ulike/trunk/admin/admin-ajax.php
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/bee2e520-46cc-4b54-9849-fafb9b37ba19?source=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "WP ULike \u2013 Like \u0026 Dislike Buttons for Engagement and Feedback",
          "vendor": "alimir",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "4.8.3.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The WP ULike plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 4.8.3.1. This is due to the `wp_ulike_delete_history_api` AJAX action not verifying that the log entry being deleted belongs to the current user. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above (granted the \u0027stats\u0027 capability is assigned to their role), to delete arbitrary log entries belonging to other users via the \u0027id\u0027 parameter."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El plugin WP ULike para WordPress es vulnerable a Referencia Directa Insegura a Objeto en todas las versiones hasta e incluyendo la 4.8.3.1. Esto se debe a que la acci\u00f3n AJAX \u0027wp_ulike_delete_history_api\u0027 no verifica que la entrada de registro que se est\u00e1 eliminando pertenezca al usuario actual. Esto hace posible que atacantes autenticados, con acceso de nivel Suscriptor y superior (siempre que la capacidad \u0027stats\u0027 est\u00e9 asignada a su rol), eliminen entradas de registro arbitrarias pertenecientes a otros usuarios a trav\u00e9s del par\u00e1metro \u0027id\u0027."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-0909",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:11:36.903",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-0909",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "yes"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-02-03T20:49:24.250071Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-02-03T04:15:56.013",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-ulike/tags/4.8.3.1/admin/admin-ajax.php#L94"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-ulike/trunk/admin/admin-ajax.php#L94"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3451296/wp-ulike/trunk/admin/admin-ajax.php"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/bee2e520-46cc-4b54-9849-fafb9b37ba19?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-639"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.