FKIE_CVE-2025-71180

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-01-31 12:16 - Updated: 2026-02-03 16:44
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: counter: interrupt-cnt: Drop IRQF_NO_THREAD flag An IRQ handler can either be IRQF_NO_THREAD or acquire spinlock_t, as CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING warns: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.18.0-rc1+git... #1 ----------------------------- some-user-space-process/1251 is trying to lock: (&counter->events_list_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: counter_push_event [counter] other info that might help us debug this: context-{2:2} no locks held by some-user-space-process/.... stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1251 Comm: some-user-space-process 6.18.0-rc1+git... #1 PREEMPT Call trace: show_stack (C) dump_stack_lvl dump_stack __lock_acquire lock_acquire _raw_spin_lock_irqsave counter_push_event [counter] interrupt_cnt_isr [interrupt_cnt] __handle_irq_event_percpu handle_irq_event handle_simple_irq handle_irq_desc generic_handle_domain_irq gpio_irq_handler handle_irq_desc generic_handle_domain_irq gic_handle_irq call_on_irq_stack do_interrupt_handler el0_interrupt __el0_irq_handler_common el0t_64_irq_handler el0t_64_irq ... and Sebastian correctly points out. Remove IRQF_NO_THREAD as an alternative to switching to raw_spinlock_t, because the latter would limit all potential nested locks to raw_spinlock_t only.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncounter: interrupt-cnt: Drop IRQF_NO_THREAD flag\n\nAn IRQ handler can either be IRQF_NO_THREAD or acquire spinlock_t, as\nCONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING warns:\n=============================\n[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]\n6.18.0-rc1+git... #1\n-----------------------------\nsome-user-space-process/1251 is trying to lock:\n(\u0026counter-\u003eevents_list_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: counter_push_event [counter]\nother info that might help us debug this:\ncontext-{2:2}\nno locks held by some-user-space-process/....\nstack backtrace:\nCPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1251 Comm: some-user-space-process 6.18.0-rc1+git... #1 PREEMPT\nCall trace:\n show_stack (C)\n dump_stack_lvl\n dump_stack\n __lock_acquire\n lock_acquire\n _raw_spin_lock_irqsave\n counter_push_event [counter]\n interrupt_cnt_isr [interrupt_cnt]\n __handle_irq_event_percpu\n handle_irq_event\n handle_simple_irq\n handle_irq_desc\n generic_handle_domain_irq\n gpio_irq_handler\n handle_irq_desc\n generic_handle_domain_irq\n gic_handle_irq\n call_on_irq_stack\n do_interrupt_handler\n el0_interrupt\n __el0_irq_handler_common\n el0t_64_irq_handler\n el0t_64_irq\n\n... and Sebastian correctly points out. Remove IRQF_NO_THREAD as an\nalternative to switching to raw_spinlock_t, because the latter would limit\nall potential nested locks to raw_spinlock_t only."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-71180",
  "lastModified": "2026-02-03T16:44:36.630",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2026-01-31T12:16:02.997",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c5a3175aecf82cd86dfcbef2a23e8b26d8d8e7c"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/23f9485510c338476b9735d516c1d4aacb810d46"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/425886b1f8304621b3f16632b274357067d5f13f"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/49a66829dd3653695e60d7cae13521d131362fcd"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/51d2e5d6491447258cb39ff1deb93df15d3c23cb"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef668c9a2261ec9287faba6e6ef05a98b391aa2b"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…