FKIE_CVE-2025-71090

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-01-13 16:16 - Updated: 2026-01-14 16:26
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix nfsd_file reference leak in nfsd4_add_rdaccess_to_wrdeleg() nfsd4_add_rdaccess_to_wrdeleg() unconditionally overwrites fp->fi_fds[O_RDONLY] with a newly acquired nfsd_file. However, if the client already has a SHARE_ACCESS_READ open from a previous OPEN operation, this action overwrites the existing pointer without releasing its reference, orphaning the previous reference. Additionally, the function originally stored the same nfsd_file pointer in both fp->fi_fds[O_RDONLY] and fp->fi_rdeleg_file with only a single reference. When put_deleg_file() runs, it clears fi_rdeleg_file and calls nfs4_file_put_access() to release the file. However, nfs4_file_put_access() only releases fi_fds[O_RDONLY] when the fi_access[O_RDONLY] counter drops to zero. If another READ open exists on the file, the counter remains elevated and the nfsd_file reference from the delegation is never released. This potentially causes open conflicts on that file. Then, on server shutdown, these leaks cause __nfsd_file_cache_purge() to encounter files with an elevated reference count that cannot be cleaned up, ultimately triggering a BUG() in kmem_cache_destroy() because there are still nfsd_file objects allocated in that cache.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfsd: fix nfsd_file reference leak in nfsd4_add_rdaccess_to_wrdeleg()\n\nnfsd4_add_rdaccess_to_wrdeleg() unconditionally overwrites\nfp-\u003efi_fds[O_RDONLY] with a newly acquired nfsd_file. However, if\nthe client already has a SHARE_ACCESS_READ open from a previous OPEN\noperation, this action overwrites the existing pointer without\nreleasing its reference, orphaning the previous reference.\n\nAdditionally, the function originally stored the same nfsd_file\npointer in both fp-\u003efi_fds[O_RDONLY] and fp-\u003efi_rdeleg_file with\nonly a single reference. When put_deleg_file() runs, it clears\nfi_rdeleg_file and calls nfs4_file_put_access() to release the file.\n\nHowever, nfs4_file_put_access() only releases fi_fds[O_RDONLY] when\nthe fi_access[O_RDONLY] counter drops to zero. If another READ open\nexists on the file, the counter remains elevated and the nfsd_file\nreference from the delegation is never released. This potentially\ncauses open conflicts on that file.\n\nThen, on server shutdown, these leaks cause __nfsd_file_cache_purge()\nto encounter files with an elevated reference count that cannot be\ncleaned up, ultimately triggering a BUG() in kmem_cache_destroy()\nbecause there are still nfsd_file objects allocated in that cache."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-71090",
  "lastModified": "2026-01-14T16:26:00.933",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2026-01-13T16:16:08.700",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8072e34e1387d03102b788677d491e2bcceef6f5"
    },
    {
      "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c07dc84ed67c5a182273171639bacbbb87c12175"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…