FKIE_CVE-2025-71070
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-01-13 16:16 - Updated: 2026-01-14 16:26
Severity ?
Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ublk: clean up user copy references on ublk server exit
If a ublk server process releases a ublk char device file, any requests
dispatched to the ublk server but not yet completed will retain a ref
value of UBLK_REFCOUNT_INIT. Before commit e63d2228ef83 ("ublk: simplify
aborting ublk request"), __ublk_fail_req() would decrement the reference
count before completing the failed request. However, that commit
optimized __ublk_fail_req() to call __ublk_complete_rq() directly
without decrementing the request reference count.
The leaked reference count incorrectly allows user copy and zero copy
operations on the completed ublk request. It also triggers the
WARN_ON_ONCE(refcount_read(&io->ref)) warnings in ublk_queue_reinit()
and ublk_deinit_queue().
Commit c5c5eb24ed61 ("ublk: avoid ublk_io_release() called after ublk
char dev is closed") already fixed the issue for ublk devices using
UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY or UBLK_F_AUTO_BUF_REG. However, the reference
count leak also affects UBLK_F_USER_COPY, the other reference-counted
data copy mode. Fix the condition in ublk_check_and_reset_active_ref()
to include all reference-counted data copy modes. This ensures that any
ublk requests still owned by the ublk server when it exits have their
reference counts reset to 0.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nublk: clean up user copy references on ublk server exit\n\nIf a ublk server process releases a ublk char device file, any requests\ndispatched to the ublk server but not yet completed will retain a ref\nvalue of UBLK_REFCOUNT_INIT. Before commit e63d2228ef83 (\"ublk: simplify\naborting ublk request\"), __ublk_fail_req() would decrement the reference\ncount before completing the failed request. However, that commit\noptimized __ublk_fail_req() to call __ublk_complete_rq() directly\nwithout decrementing the request reference count.\nThe leaked reference count incorrectly allows user copy and zero copy\noperations on the completed ublk request. It also triggers the\nWARN_ON_ONCE(refcount_read(\u0026io-\u003eref)) warnings in ublk_queue_reinit()\nand ublk_deinit_queue().\nCommit c5c5eb24ed61 (\"ublk: avoid ublk_io_release() called after ublk\nchar dev is closed\") already fixed the issue for ublk devices using\nUBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY or UBLK_F_AUTO_BUF_REG. However, the reference\ncount leak also affects UBLK_F_USER_COPY, the other reference-counted\ndata copy mode. Fix the condition in ublk_check_and_reset_active_ref()\nto include all reference-counted data copy modes. This ensures that any\nublk requests still owned by the ublk server when it exits have their\nreference counts reset to 0."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-71070",
"lastModified": "2026-01-14T16:26:00.933",
"metrics": {},
"published": "2026-01-13T16:16:06.413",
"references": [
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/13456b4f1033d911f8bf3a0a1195656f293ba0f6"
},
{
"source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/daa24603d9f0808929514ee62ced30052ca7221c"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…