FKIE_CVE-2025-69420

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-01-27 16:16 - Updated: 2026-02-02 18:33
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response verification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first validating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when processing a malformed TimeStamp Response file. Impact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a malformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or NULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service. The functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2() access the signing cert attribute value without validating its type. When the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory through the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash. Exploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed TimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The TimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the exploit is just a Denial of Service. For these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the TimeStamp Response implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.
References
openssl-security@openssl.orghttps://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/27c7012c91cc986a598d7540f3079dfde2416eb9Patch
openssl-security@openssl.orghttps://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4e254b48ad93cc092be3dd62d97015f33f73133aPatch
openssl-security@openssl.orghttps://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/564fd9c73787f25693bf9e75faf7bf6bb1305d4ePatch
openssl-security@openssl.orghttps://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5eb0770ffcf11b785cf374ff3c19196245e54f1bPatch
openssl-security@openssl.orghttps://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a99349ebfc519999edc50620abe24d599b9eb085Patch
openssl-security@openssl.orghttps://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txtVendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
openssl openssl *
openssl openssl *
openssl openssl *
openssl openssl *
openssl openssl *
openssl openssl *
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E000B986-6A31-468F-9EA3-B9D16DB16FB2",
              "versionEndExcluding": "1.1.1ze",
              "versionStartIncluding": "1.1.1",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "C76C5F55-5243-4461-82F5-2FEBFF4D59FA",
              "versionEndExcluding": "3.0.19",
              "versionStartIncluding": "3.0.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "F5292E9E-6B50-409F-9219-7B0A04047AD8",
              "versionEndExcluding": "3.3.6",
              "versionStartIncluding": "3.3.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "B9D3DCAE-317D-4DFB-93F0-7A235A229619",
              "versionEndExcluding": "3.4.4",
              "versionStartIncluding": "3.4.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "1CAC7CBE-EC03-4089-938A-0CEEB2E09B62",
              "versionEndExcluding": "3.5.5",
              "versionStartIncluding": "3.5.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "68352537-5E99-4F4D-B78A-BCF0353A70A5",
              "versionEndExcluding": "3.6.1",
              "versionStartIncluding": "3.6.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Issue summary: A type confusion vulnerability exists in the TimeStamp Response\nverification code where an ASN1_TYPE union member is accessed without first\nvalidating the type, causing an invalid or NULL pointer dereference when\nprocessing a malformed TimeStamp Response file.\n\nImpact summary: An application calling TS_RESP_verify_response() with a\nmalformed TimeStamp Response can be caused to dereference an invalid or\nNULL pointer when reading, resulting in a Denial of Service.\n\nThe functions ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() and ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2()\naccess the signing cert attribute value without validating its type.\nWhen the type is not V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, this results in accessing invalid memory\nthrough the ASN1_TYPE union, causing a crash.\n\nExploiting this vulnerability requires an attacker to provide a malformed\nTimeStamp Response to an application that verifies timestamp responses. The\nTimeStamp protocol (RFC 3161) is not widely used and the impact of the\nexploit is just a Denial of Service. For these reasons the issue was\nassessed as Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue,\nas the TimeStamp Response implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module\nboundary.\n\nOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue.\n\nOpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Resumen del problema: Existe una vulnerabilidad de confusi\u00f3n de tipos en el c\u00f3digo de verificaci\u00f3n de la Respuesta de Marca de Tiempo donde se accede a un miembro de uni\u00f3n ASN1_TYPE sin validar primero el tipo, causando una desreferencia de puntero inv\u00e1lido o NULL al procesar un archivo de Respuesta de Marca de Tiempo malformado.\n\nResumen del impacto: Una aplicaci\u00f3n que llama a TS_RESP_verify_response() con una Respuesta de Marca de Tiempo malformada puede ser inducida a desreferenciar un puntero inv\u00e1lido o NULL al leer, resultando en una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio.\n\nLas funciones ossl_ess_get_signing_cert() y ossl_ess_get_signing_cert_v2() acceden al valor del atributo del certificado de firma sin validar su tipo. Cuando el tipo no es V_ASN1_SEQUENCE, esto resulta en el acceso a memoria inv\u00e1lida a trav\u00e9s de la uni\u00f3n ASN1_TYPE, causando un fallo.\n\nExplotar esta vulnerabilidad requiere que un atacante proporcione una Respuesta de Marca de Tiempo malformada a una aplicaci\u00f3n que verifica las respuestas de marca de tiempo. El protocolo de Marca de Tiempo (RFC 3161) no es ampliamente utilizado y el impacto del exploit es solo una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio. Por estas razones, el problema fue evaluado como de baja severidad.\n\nLos m\u00f3dulos FIPS en 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 y 3.0 no se ven afectados por este problema, ya que la implementaci\u00f3n de la Respuesta de Marca de Tiempo est\u00e1 fuera del l\u00edmite del m\u00f3dulo FIPS de OpenSSL.\n\nOpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0 y 1.1.1 son vulnerables a este problema.\n\nOpenSSL 1.0.2 no se ve afectado por este problema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-69420",
  "lastModified": "2026-02-02T18:33:30.557",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 7.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-01-27T16:16:34.317",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/27c7012c91cc986a598d7540f3079dfde2416eb9"
    },
    {
      "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4e254b48ad93cc092be3dd62d97015f33f73133a"
    },
    {
      "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/564fd9c73787f25693bf9e75faf7bf6bb1305d4e"
    },
    {
      "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/5eb0770ffcf11b785cf374ff3c19196245e54f1b"
    },
    {
      "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
      "tags": [
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a99349ebfc519999edc50620abe24d599b9eb085"
    },
    {
      "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260127.txt"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-754"
        }
      ],
      "source": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.