FKIE_CVE-2025-51569

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-07-31 15:15 - Updated: 2026-04-15 00:35
Severity ?
6.1 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Summary
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the LB-Link BL-CPE300M 01.01.02P42U14_06 router's web interface. The /goform/goform_get_cmd_process endpoint fails to sanitize user input in the cmd parameter before reflecting it into a text/html response. This allows unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript, which is executed in the context of the router's origin when the crafted URL is accessed. The issue requires user interaction to exploit.
References
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.lb-link.com/CPE300M-AX300-4G-LTE-Router-pd502775568.html
cve@mitre.orghttps://www.zyenra.com/blog/xss-in-lb-link-lb-cpe300m.html
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the LB-Link BL-CPE300M 01.01.02P42U14_06 router\u0027s web interface. The /goform/goform_get_cmd_process endpoint fails to sanitize user input in the cmd parameter before reflecting it into a text/html response. This allows unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript, which is executed in the context of the router\u0027s origin when the crafted URL is accessed. The issue requires user interaction to exploit."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Existe una vulnerabilidad de Cross-site Scripting (XSS) en la interfaz web del router LB-Link BL-CPE300M 01.01.02P42U14_06. El endpoint /goform/goform_get_cmd_process no depura la entrada del usuario en el par\u00e1metro cmd antes de reflejarla en una respuesta text/html. Esto permite a atacantes no autenticados inyectar JavaScript arbitrario, que se ejecuta en el contexto del origen del router al acceder a la URL manipulada. El problema requiere la interacci\u00f3n del usuario para explotarse."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-51569",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-15T00:35:42.020",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.1,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 2.7,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-07-31T15:15:37.120",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://www.lb-link.com/CPE300M-AX300-4G-LTE-Router-pd502775568.html"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "url": "https://www.zyenra.com/blog/xss-in-lb-link-lb-cpe300m.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-79"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.