FKIE_CVE-2025-50537
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-01-26 16:15 - Updated: 2026-02-04 15:11
Severity ?
Summary
Stack overflow vulnerability in eslint before 9.26.0 when serializing objects with circular references in eslint/lib/shared/serialization.js. The exploit is triggered via the RuleTester.run() method, which validates test cases and checks for duplicates. During validation, the internal function checkDuplicateTestCase() is called, which in turn uses the isSerializable() function for serialization checks. When a circular reference object is passed in, isSerializable() enters infinite recursion, ultimately causing a stack overflow.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| cve@mitre.org | https://gist.github.com/lyyffee/2ee1815e5c2da82c05e9838b9bfefbbc | Third Party Advisory | |
| cve@mitre.org | https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/19646 | Exploit, Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openjsf:eslint:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "F7AC358D-8192-4DFC-8039-5C0B0B14E714",
"versionEndExcluding": "9.26.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Stack overflow vulnerability in eslint before 9.26.0 when serializing objects with circular references in eslint/lib/shared/serialization.js. The exploit is triggered via the RuleTester.run() method, which validates test cases and checks for duplicates. During validation, the internal function checkDuplicateTestCase() is called, which in turn uses the isSerializable() function for serialization checks. When a circular reference object is passed in, isSerializable() enters infinite recursion, ultimately causing a stack overflow."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Vulnerabilidad de desbordamiento de pila en eslint anterior a la 9.26.0 al serializar objetos con referencias circulares en eslint/lib/shared/serialization.js. El exploit se activa a trav\u00e9s del m\u00e9todo RuleTester.run(), que valida los casos de prueba y busca duplicados. Durante la validaci\u00f3n, se llama a la funci\u00f3n interna checkDuplicateTestCase(), que a su vez utiliza la funci\u00f3n isSerializable() para las comprobaciones de serializaci\u00f3n. Cuando se pasa un objeto con referencia circular, isSerializable() entra en recursi\u00f3n infinita, lo que finalmente causa un desbordamiento de pila."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-50537",
"lastModified": "2026-02-04T15:11:00.737",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 5.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-01-26T16:15:58.330",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://gist.github.com/lyyffee/2ee1815e5c2da82c05e9838b9bfefbbc"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/19646"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-674"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…