FKIE_CVE-2025-32563

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-04-09 17:15 - Updated: 2026-04-01 17:22
Severity ?
Summary
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in dangrossman WP Calais Auto Tagger calais-auto-tagger allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Calais Auto Tagger: from n/a through <= 2.0.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in dangrossman WP Calais Auto Tagger calais-auto-tagger allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Calais Auto Tagger: from n/a through \u003c= 2.0."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "La vulnerabilidad de Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) en dangrossman WP Calais Auto Tagger permite Cross-Site Request Forgery. Este problema afecta a WP Calais Auto Tagger desde n/d hasta la versi\u00f3n 2.0."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-32563",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-01T17:22:34.120",
  "metrics": {},
  "published": "2025-04-09T17:15:46.030",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/calais-auto-tagger/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-calais-auto-tagger-plugin-2-0-csrf-to-stored-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "audit@patchstack.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…