FKIE_CVE-2025-14675
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-07 08:16 - Updated: 2026-04-22 21:27
Severity ?
Summary
The Meta Box plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion due to insufficient file path validation in the 'ajax_delete_file' function in all versions up to, and including, 5.11.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to delete arbitrary files on the server, which can easily lead to remote code execution when the right file is deleted (such as wp-config.php).
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The Meta Box plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion due to insufficient file path validation in the \u0027ajax_delete_file\u0027 function in all versions up to, and including, 5.11.1. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to delete arbitrary files on the server, which can easily lead to remote code execution when the right file is deleted (such as wp-config.php)."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El plugin Meta Box para WordPress es vulnerable a la eliminaci\u00f3n arbitraria de archivos debido a una validaci\u00f3n insuficiente de la ruta de archivo en la funci\u00f3n \u0027ajax_delete_file\u0027 en todas las versiones hasta la 5.11.1, inclusive. Esto hace posible que atacantes autenticados, con acceso de nivel Colaborador o superior, eliminen archivos arbitrarios en el servidor, lo que puede conducir f\u00e1cilmente a la ejecuci\u00f3n remota de c\u00f3digo cuando se elimina el archivo correcto (como wp-config.php)."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-14675",
"lastModified": "2026-04-22T21:27:27.950",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.2,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-03-07T08:16:05.963",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://github.com/wpmetabox/meta-box/pull/1654"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/meta-box/tags/5.11.0/inc/fields/file.php#L30"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/meta-box/tags/5.11.0/inc/fields/file.php#L54"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3475210/meta-box#file3"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/036467de-95bb-4bfd-9522-df8dc17f3102?source=cve"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-22"
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…