FKIE_CVE-2025-14128

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-01-07 12:16 - Updated: 2026-04-15 00:35
Summary
The Stumble! for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the `$_SERVER['PHP_SELF']` variable in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Stumble! for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the `$_SERVER[\u0027PHP_SELF\u0027]` variable in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El plugin Stumble! for WordPress para WordPress es vulnerable a Cross-Site Scripting Reflejado a trav\u00e9s de la variable \u0027$_SERVER[\u0027PHP_SELF\u0027]\u0027 en todas las versiones hasta la versi\u00f3n, e incluyendo, 1.1.1 debido a una sanitizaci\u00f3n de entrada y escape de salida insuficientes. Esto hace posible que atacantes no autenticados inyecten scripts web arbitrarios en p\u00e1ginas que se ejecutan si pueden enga\u00f1ar con \u00e9xito a un usuario para que realice una acci\u00f3n como hacer clic en un enlace."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-14128",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-15T00:35:42.020",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.1,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 2.7,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-01-07T12:16:53.507",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/stumble-for-wordpress/tags/1.1.1/stumble.php#L143"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/stumble-for-wordpress/trunk/stumble.php#L143"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/stumble-for-wordpress/"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/19e1421d-8cb4-44b6-a982-769539b19582?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-79"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…