FKIE_CVE-2025-10679
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-23 06:16 - Updated: 2026-04-24 16:32
Severity ?
Summary
The ReviewX – WooCommerce Product Reviews with Multi-Criteria, Reminder Emails, Google Reviews, Schema & More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary method calls in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.12. This is due to insufficient input validation in the bulkTenReviews function that allows user-controlled data to be passed directly to a variable function call mechanism. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to call arbitrary PHP class methods that take no inputs or have default values, potentially leading to information disclosure or remote code execution depending on available methods and server configuration.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The ReviewX \u2013 WooCommerce Product Reviews with Multi-Criteria, Reminder Emails, Google Reviews, Schema \u0026 More plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary method calls in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.12. This is due to insufficient input validation in the bulkTenReviews function that allows user-controlled data to be passed directly to a variable function call mechanism. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to call arbitrary PHP class methods that take no inputs or have default values, potentially leading to information disclosure or remote code execution depending on available methods and server configuration."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El plugin ReviewX \u2013 WooCommerce Product Reviews with Multi-Criteria, Reminder Emails, Google Reviews, Schema \u0026amp; More para WordPress es vulnerable a llamadas a m\u00e9todos arbitrarios en todas las versiones hasta la 2.2.12, inclusive. Esto se debe a una validaci\u00f3n de entrada insuficiente en la funci\u00f3n bulkTenReviews que permite que los datos controlados por el usuario se pasen directamente a un mecanismo de llamada a funci\u00f3n variable. Esto hace posible que atacantes no autenticados llamen a m\u00e9todos de clase PHP arbitrarios que no toman entradas o tienen valores predeterminados, lo que podr\u00eda llevar a una revelaci\u00f3n de informaci\u00f3n o ejecuci\u00f3n remota de c\u00f3digo dependiendo de los m\u00e9todos disponibles y la configuraci\u00f3n del servidor."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-10679",
"lastModified": "2026-04-24T16:32:53.997",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7.3,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.4,
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2026-03-23T06:16:17.797",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/reviewx/tags/2.2.7/app/Rest/Controllers/ReviewController.php#L426"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/reviewx/tags/2.2.7/app/Services/ReviewService.php#L731"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/reviewx/tags/2.2.7/app/Utilities/Helper.php#L65"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/reviewx/tags/2.2.7/routes/api.php#L220"
},
{
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/0935ede4-05bc-48a2-94a3-8d92002e02bb?source=cve"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-94"
}
],
"source": "security@wordfence.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…